“…The protective effect was also evaluated in terms of resistance and pseudo-capacitance of the conversion layers; adjusted for the EIS data, the results, as functions of the RE concentration (0.01,0.1, 0.5, and 1 g L −1 ) for the bath temperature and immersion time that yielded the highest electrochemical performance, are shown in Figure 11 From Figure 11 and equation 7, it was computed that the average improvements of Rp for the CeCCs are 11.10 ± 0.54, 70.75 ± 3.58, 29.12 ± 1.45, and 50.55 ± 1.45 times, using an ion concentration of 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 g L −1 , correspondingly; whereas for the same concentration for lanthanum, the In summary, it has been established that treatments of AA6061 aluminum alloys by thermal activation up to 70°C in a RE(NO 3 ) x ion solution with a concentration lower than 0.5 g L −1 allow the formation of an oxide/hydroxide layer over the intermetallic and aluminum oxide composite film that covers the metal matrix [56] with sufficient thickness and uniformity to provide a higher level of protection than the room temperature treatments. As a consequence, R p is increased to large values depending on an adequate combination of ion concentration, and bath immersion time, although this last variable above 600 min exhibits a small contribution to the barrier properties.…”