1974
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-146-38087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection of Chicks Against E. coli Infection by Dietary Supplementation with Vitamin E

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the immune response of hens and their offspring fed rations with no vitamin E supplementation and stressed with 10% fish oil (vitamin E calculated at 8 to 10 mg/kg) was not reduced below that of birds receiving rations containing 10% soybean oil and vitamin E addition (calculated at 76 mg/kg) despite rapid decline in egg production and hatch of fertile eggs on the stressed ration. Heinzerling et al (1974) cited previous work of their laboratory that selenium alone at levels above .1 ppm or in combination with vitamin E also enhanced immune response of mice but that synthetic antioxidants did not do so. Tengerdy and Nockels (1973) referred to research by their group showing that after exposure of chickens to oxygen insufficiency, the resulting hypoxia stimulated immune response, despite the derpessing effect on hatchability, and that hypoxia and vitamin E 7.2 e 9.8 9.8…”
Section: Effects Of Infection On Apparent Vitamin Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the immune response of hens and their offspring fed rations with no vitamin E supplementation and stressed with 10% fish oil (vitamin E calculated at 8 to 10 mg/kg) was not reduced below that of birds receiving rations containing 10% soybean oil and vitamin E addition (calculated at 76 mg/kg) despite rapid decline in egg production and hatch of fertile eggs on the stressed ration. Heinzerling et al (1974) cited previous work of their laboratory that selenium alone at levels above .1 ppm or in combination with vitamin E also enhanced immune response of mice but that synthetic antioxidants did not do so. Tengerdy and Nockels (1973) referred to research by their group showing that after exposure of chickens to oxygen insufficiency, the resulting hypoxia stimulated immune response, despite the derpessing effect on hatchability, and that hypoxia and vitamin E 7.2 e 9.8 9.8…”
Section: Effects Of Infection On Apparent Vitamin Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The findings of Heinzerling et al (1974) in Table 7 show that vitamin E supplementation of a practical ration, inferred to contain 43 mg vitamin E/kg, sharply reduced mortality and significantly improved weight gains and blood titers in chicks in which a moderately severe infection of E. coli was induced. The effectiveness of adding 150 mg of vitamin E/kg to the ration agrees with their earlier work, cited by them, of similar additons response of chicks and of mice against sheep red blood cells (RBC) and of mice against tetanus toxoid.…”
Section: Effects Of Infection On Apparent Vitamin Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to have no effect, or to depress proliferation of lymphocytes in vitro.2:3.25.26 Parenteral vitamin E supplementation every other day for 2 weeks following 20% TBSA steam burn to mice improved the delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB).27 Vitamin E supplementation also improves both primary and secondary antibody production. 7,9,[28][29][30][31] Of interest are the observations in this study that increasing amounts of vitamin E do not sustain the beneficial effects of the moderate supplemental dose. Heinzerling and associates supplemented the solid diets of chicks with vitamin E prior to parenteral challenge with E. coli, and did not observe a loss of beneficial effect as the dose was increased from 150 mg of vitamin E per kg of chow to 300 mgjkg.7 However, the same group found varying efficacy of supplemental vitamin E added to the solid diets of mice fed prior to challenge with D.…”
Section: E21mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This implies that vitamin E possesses the inherent potential to protect the reproductive tissues against many chemical as well as infectious pathologies (Pham-Huy et al, 2008). Vitamin E supplementations increase the resistance of chicks against Escherichia coli (Heinzerling et al, 1994) and of lambs against Chlamydia infection (Stephens and Nockles, 1979). Pigs supplemented with vitamin E and selenium had increased phagocytic activity of the reticuloendothelial system (Heinzerling et al, 1994).…”
Section: Specimen Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%