2002
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection of Striatal Neurons by Joint Blockade of D1 and D2 Receptor Subtypes in an in Vitro Model of Cerebral Hypoxia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24,25 In addition, receptor-mediated mechanisms have been proposed to explain dopamine-induced neurotoxicity and the possible neuroprotective effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists have been investigated in several studies. 26 In our TTC staining experiments, both SCH23390 (D1 receptor antagonist) and metoclopramide (D2 receptor antagonist) failed to reduce OGD-induced damage and did not revert the enhanced toxicity caused by linopirdine, suggesting that, in our model, brain damage occurred in a dopamine receptor-independent manner. These results are not surprising, since conflicting evidence are present in the literature; indeed, while some studies failed to show neuroprotection by D1 and D2 receptor antagonists, others found that receptor stimulation (mainly the D2 subtype) reduced neuronal damage by blocking the apoptotic pathway (for a comprehensive review, see Bozzi and Borrelli 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…24,25 In addition, receptor-mediated mechanisms have been proposed to explain dopamine-induced neurotoxicity and the possible neuroprotective effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists have been investigated in several studies. 26 In our TTC staining experiments, both SCH23390 (D1 receptor antagonist) and metoclopramide (D2 receptor antagonist) failed to reduce OGD-induced damage and did not revert the enhanced toxicity caused by linopirdine, suggesting that, in our model, brain damage occurred in a dopamine receptor-independent manner. These results are not surprising, since conflicting evidence are present in the literature; indeed, while some studies failed to show neuroprotection by D1 and D2 receptor antagonists, others found that receptor stimulation (mainly the D2 subtype) reduced neuronal damage by blocking the apoptotic pathway (for a comprehensive review, see Bozzi and Borrelli 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, an exclusive role for D1 receptor activation in mediating MSN degeneration is contradicted by evidence that blocking D2 receptor stimulation significantly reverses DA potentiation of mutant huntingtin-induced MSN cell death (Charvin et al, 2005). As cultured striatal neurons can be protected by antagonism of D1 and D2 receptors, it is possible that both D1 and D2 receptor activation might contribute to neurotoxicity (Davis et al, 2002; Bozzi and Borrelli, 2006). …”
Section: Da and Excitotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an exclusive role for D1 receptor activation in mediating MSN degeneration is contradicted by evidence that blocking D2 receptor stimulation significantly reverses DA potentiation of mutant huntingtin-induced MSN cell death (Charvin et al, 2005). As cultured striatal neurons can be protected by antagonism of D1 and D2 receptors, it is possible that both D1 and D2 receptor activation might contribute to neurotoxicity (Davis et al, 2002; Bozzi and Borrelli, 2006). Thus, the exact nature of DA and NMDA interactions are dynamic and complex, indicating a need for further investigation into the differential effects of D1 and D2 activation on GLU signaling in the HD striatum.…”
Section: Da and Glu Receptor Interactions In Hdmentioning
confidence: 99%