2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61409-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective effect of montelukast on lower and upper respiratory tract responses to short-term cat allergen exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
3
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the LAR AUC for OC000459 in sequence B was greater than placebo in sequence A, suggesting again no effect of OC000459 on the LAR in sequence B. Any possible carry-over effect was also minimised by the use of a 3-week washout period, which is longer than has been used in other allergen challenge studies [12][13][14]. Additionally, there are no pharmacokinetic reasons to explain a duration of action of OC000459 after 3 weeks, as the terminal half-life is 13 h (personal communication) and there are no pharmacologically active metabolites of this drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, the LAR AUC for OC000459 in sequence B was greater than placebo in sequence A, suggesting again no effect of OC000459 on the LAR in sequence B. Any possible carry-over effect was also minimised by the use of a 3-week washout period, which is longer than has been used in other allergen challenge studies [12][13][14]. Additionally, there are no pharmacokinetic reasons to explain a duration of action of OC000459 after 3 weeks, as the terminal half-life is 13 h (personal communication) and there are no pharmacologically active metabolites of this drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In these studies, montelukast was demonstrated to improve pulmonary function within 3-12 h after ingestion. This effect of a single-dose lasted up to 24 h. In other trials, the onset of action of montelukast applied orally was in the range of 1-3 days [12,15,16]. Furthermore, it was suggested that LTRA are able to reduce both the early and late asthmatic response in allergic subjects when given before allergen challenge [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These biological properties can be attenuated by anti-LT drugs. Reduction of inflammation and a decrease in Fe,NO following montelukast treatment is thought to occur via two distinct mechanisms involving LTs, which are: direct inhibition at the receptor level; or inhibition of eosinophil recruitment into the lung, which indirectly reduces the capacity for further release of LTs [12,13]. However, the mechanisms by which montelukast modulates nitric oxide (NO) production are not yet completely understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The evidence of the value of montelukast in patients with a history of both allergic rhinitis and asthma is confined to a single randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled study in 52 patients with symptoms provoked by exposure to cats. 31 In a large study of nearly 900 patients, montelukast 10 mg was found to be inferior to fluticasone nasal spray 200 mcg per day in controlling symptoms of allergic rhinitis in patients with persistent asthma. 32 Fluticasone nasal spray became available by generic name in the first week in April 2006, 33 and the MCO cost will soon be $1.00 or less per day of therapy.…”
Section: Editorial Subjects-in This Issue and In Previous Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%