Protective Effects of Long-Term Usage of Cyclo-Oxygenase-2 Inhibitors on Colorectal Cancer in Genetically Predisposed Individuals and Their Overall Effect on Prognosis: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health concern, accounting for significant cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite advancements in early detection and treatment modalities, the prevention of CRC remains a critical goal. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an inducible enzyme involved in the production of pro-inflammatory prostaglandins, which play a crucial role in various cellular processes, including inflammation, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Elevated COX-2 expression has been consistently observed in colorectal tumors, indicating their role in the pathogenesis of cancer. COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib and rofecoxib, have been studied as potentially effective treatment modalities due to their ability to decrease prostaglandin levels, which are generally higher in cancer patients. Aberrant prostaglandin production is linked to the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, during which adenomas turn dysplastic and accumulate enough damage to become malignant. COX-2 inhibitors have also been shown to modulate various signaling pathways involved in CRC development, such as wingless-related integration site/β-catenin (Wnt/β-catenin), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and phosphoinositide-3-kinaseprotein kinase B/Akt (PI3K/Akt) pathways. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the protective effects of long-term usage of COX-2 inhibitors on CRC in genetically predisposed individuals and their overall effect on the prognosis of the disease. The researchers conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and collected data from several databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search strategy combined keywords related to CRC, COX-2 inhibitors, protective effects, and prognosis. They identified 1189 articles and shortlisted 26 full-text articles that met the eligibility criteria. Quality assessment tools, such as the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review (AMSTAR) for systematic reviews, the Cochrane bias assessment tool for randomized control trials, the scale for the assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) checklist for narrative reviews, and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool for crosssectional studies and case reports, are used. This review's conclusions will assist in determining the effectiveness of COX-2 inhibitors to prevent CRC. This review may also contribute to developing guidelines for clinicians to manage genetically predisposed individuals with CRC. Furthermore, the results of this review will shed light on the potential of COX-2 inhibitors as a preventive measure against CRC in genetically predisposed individuals.