2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02496.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protégés Negative Mentoring Experiences: Construct Development and Nomological Validation

Abstract: Two studies were conducted to operationalize the construct of negative mentoring experiences, establish content validity, and test theorybased predictions associated with a nomological network of related variables. As predicted, the negative experiences of mentor Distancing Behavior and Lack of Mentor Expertise were more often reported in the separation phase and among prottgts in formally arranged mentoring relationships. All types of experiences were related to careerrelated support, psychosocial support, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
169
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
169
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We also considered two relationship lengths that were measured as the period of the mentoring relationship and coaching relationship. The perceived similarity was measured using nine items that Eby et al [78] developed to measure the mismatch between mentor and protégé in the aspects of personalities, habits, dispositions, life priorities, and related factors. The items were reverse-coded, such that higher values represent greater similarity [41,78].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also considered two relationship lengths that were measured as the period of the mentoring relationship and coaching relationship. The perceived similarity was measured using nine items that Eby et al [78] developed to measure the mismatch between mentor and protégé in the aspects of personalities, habits, dispositions, life priorities, and related factors. The items were reverse-coded, such that higher values represent greater similarity [41,78].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However only 29 % were Solve difficulties ( 15) Getting guidance (20) Knowing the right ways regarding the profession and getting tips on how to study the subject (2) Building confidence with the student (7) Find out problems and give solutions and develop personality…”
Section: Process Evaluation Results (Questions 4-11)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and what are the reasons for lack of cooperation between mentor and students?". These questions were based on the concept of negative mentoring which has been suggested to have better explanatory power in predicting protégé outcomes over and above positive mentoring 15 The concept of negative mentoring was developed by Eby and colleagues who define it "as specific incidents that occur between mentors and protégés, mentors" characteristic manner of interacting with protégés, or mentors" characteristics that limit their ability to effectively provide guidance to protégés. 16,17 This has worked out well in this study and the responses from m e n t e e s h a s g i v e n u s a l i s t o f causes for discordant mentor-mentee relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, trainings and visitations have both advantages and disadvantages [9]. For students embarking on such activities, at the height of doctoral education, these advantages and disadvantages may have resulted to a zerosum game vis-a-vis written productivity [10]. We are not implying that doctoral students should be discouraged from attending trainings or visiting laboratories.…”
Section: Dre and Research Productivitymentioning
confidence: 95%