2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein A chromatography for antibody purification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
337
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
337
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The selective purification steps usually comprise the mAbs adsorption to a protein A resin, followed by two further chromatography steps which remove host cell proteins (HCP), DNA, aggregates, any leached protein A and provide an adequate level of overall viral removal [3,4]. Although chromatographic separations have been the workhorse of most purification processes, several limitations have been pointed out, such as (i) batch operation, (ii) low capacity, (iii) complex scale-up, (iv) time-consuming and high pressure packing processing, (v) slow intraparticle diffusion, (vi) low chemical and proteolytic stability and consequent contamination of the final product, and (vii) the high cost of the resins [5][6][7][8][9]. The replacement of some of these chromatographic steps by non-chromatographic alternatives, with high capacity and throughput, has been then suggested [7,[10][11][12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selective purification steps usually comprise the mAbs adsorption to a protein A resin, followed by two further chromatography steps which remove host cell proteins (HCP), DNA, aggregates, any leached protein A and provide an adequate level of overall viral removal [3,4]. Although chromatographic separations have been the workhorse of most purification processes, several limitations have been pointed out, such as (i) batch operation, (ii) low capacity, (iii) complex scale-up, (iv) time-consuming and high pressure packing processing, (v) slow intraparticle diffusion, (vi) low chemical and proteolytic stability and consequent contamination of the final product, and (vii) the high cost of the resins [5][6][7][8][9]. The replacement of some of these chromatographic steps by non-chromatographic alternatives, with high capacity and throughput, has been then suggested [7,[10][11][12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staphylococcal Protein A (SPA) is a cell wall-associated protein domain exposed on the surface of the gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (Hober et al 2007). SPA has significance to biotechnology and bioscience because of its specific binding to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G (IgG) from many mammals (Jungbauer and Hahn 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Solid supports for affinity purification media must be carefully designed to achieve an efficient purification process. 26 Porous materials with large surface areas and pore diameters larger than that of the target protein (430 nm for IgG), enable high binding capacity and fast adsorption kinetics. 27 The supports must be hydrophilic (ideally a hydrophilic gel such as agarose) to reduce non-specific adsorption of proteins on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%