2008
DOI: 10.1002/aic.11668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein adsorption kinetics in charged agarose gels: Effect of agarose content and modeling

Abstract: in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).The adsorption kinetics of myoglobin in charged gels of varying agarose content have been measured macroscopically, through batch uptake experiments, and microscopically, using light microscopy with gels supported in microfluidics chips. The apparent effective pore diffusivities, determined by fitting either set of rate data to the shrinking core model, were greater than the free solution diffusivity and concentrationdependent. Moreover, the microscopically de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[176][177][178][179] In gels with low ϕ, drag is predominantly caused by viscous flow of solvent against the pore walls, so this is typically the only contribution included in models of diffusion. 180 It is clear, however, that adsorption, 181,182 electrostatic forces 181,183 and direct collisions with the pore wall 184,185 may further impede diffusion, particularly if the pore is very narrow, or the solute is charged 186,187 or bulky. [188][189][190] In addition, drag may be amplified if the gel fibres are themselves ionised, 187,191 or present a rough or corrugated surface to the diffusing fluid.…”
Section: Swelling Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[176][177][178][179] In gels with low ϕ, drag is predominantly caused by viscous flow of solvent against the pore walls, so this is typically the only contribution included in models of diffusion. 180 It is clear, however, that adsorption, 181,182 electrostatic forces 181,183 and direct collisions with the pore wall 184,185 may further impede diffusion, particularly if the pore is very narrow, or the solute is charged 186,187 or bulky. [188][189][190] In addition, drag may be amplified if the gel fibres are themselves ionised, 187,191 or present a rough or corrugated surface to the diffusing fluid.…”
Section: Swelling Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…h -1 in order to avoid any temperature fluctuations due to sample heating during the magnetic field pulse gradients. Adsorption kinetics IP adsorption isotherm in AC gel was determined following literature methods 25 . Small hydrogel samples were suspended in excess of IP solution with different concentrations and stirred for 8 h at 37°C.…”
Section: Self-diffusion Coefficients Were Measured By Diffusion Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, we propose a mathematical model accounting for the steps described above starting from chromatographic studies 32,64 . The adsorbed IP amount is given by q, as determined from the adsorption Langmuir isotherm (Figure 4) 25 . The isotherm is highly favorable at low drug concentration.…”
Section: Modeling Ip Diffusion Coefficients In Gelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown, for example, by Schirmer and Carta (2008), at the macroscopic level the mechanisms of pore and solid diffusion are not directly distinguishable because both lead to uptake curves (amount of protein adsorbed as a function of time) that have nearly the same shape…”
Section: Intraparticle Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%