“…Thus, it is expected that psychrophilic enzymes have a greater structural flexibility to increase the catalytic rate constant, and a higher degree of conformational complementarity with substrates to allow a decrease in activation energy, when compared to mesophilic and thermophilic homologues [23]. In order to shed light on these fundamental issues and to be sure that significant differences emerge, several structural comparative studies have been performed on enzyme families belonging to psychrophiles, mesophiles and thermophiles [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Even though adaptation strategies are family-specific, the following common rules hold for psychrophilic proteins: (a) the structural differences between the folded states are small and subtle, notwithstanding large differences in thermal stability; (b) there are several charged residues on the surface of psychrophilic enzymes to increase solubility and flexibility, not the conformational stability; (c) the interior packing, on the average, does not change; (d) there is a higher percentage of tiny residues (i.e., Ala, Gly, Ser, and Thr), whose small side chains make psychrophilic enzymes less compact and more flexible than the mesophilic and thermophilic counterparts.…”