2004
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein family comparison using statistical models and predicted structural information

Abstract: Background: This paper presents a simple method to increase the sensitivity of protein family comparisons by incorporating secondary structure (SS) information. We build upon the effective information theory approach towards profile-profile comparison described in [Yona & Levitt 2002]. Our method augments profile columns using PSIPRED secondary structure predictions and assesses statistical similarity using information theoretical principles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to others ( 13 , 14 ), we find that considering SS prediction leads to significant improvement in both similarity detection ( Figure 2 ) and alignment accuracy ( Figure 3 ). As expected, this improvement is more pronounced for extremely distant homologs, where direct sequence signals are weak yet SS is conserved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to others ( 13 , 14 ), we find that considering SS prediction leads to significant improvement in both similarity detection ( Figure 2 ) and alignment accuracy ( Figure 3 ). As expected, this improvement is more pronounced for extremely distant homologs, where direct sequence signals are weak yet SS is conserved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These patterns, dictated by structure and function, are often preserved better than the sequence and thus can help detecting protein similarity where individual sequence positions diverged beyond recognition. Currently, such ‘horizontal’ information is used by only a few methods ( 13 , 14 ), mainly in the form of secondary structure (SS) prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sensitive methods have been proposed that involve the comparison of predicted SS, in addition to the residue content of the two MSAs ( 7 , 35 , 36 ). These methods are directly using the SS information in the construction and scoring of profile–profile or HMM–HMM alignments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%