2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein fouling behavior of carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone composite membranes during water filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
94
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective reduction in the adsorbed protein amount occurred since BSA was excluded by the tight hydration layer on the membrane surface. 15 In all the membranes, the protein adsorption at dynamic condition was higher than the static one. It might be due to the stirring condition in the dynamic phase that forced the protein molecules to move inside the membrane pores.…”
Section: Antifouling Properties Of Membranesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effective reduction in the adsorbed protein amount occurred since BSA was excluded by the tight hydration layer on the membrane surface. 15 In all the membranes, the protein adsorption at dynamic condition was higher than the static one. It might be due to the stirring condition in the dynamic phase that forced the protein molecules to move inside the membrane pores.…”
Section: Antifouling Properties Of Membranesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…13,14 Zirconium oxide (ZrO 2 ), titanium oxide (TiO 2 ), zeolite, mesoporous silica (SiO 2 ) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are some of the examples of inorganic llers that have been previously used to fabricate hybrid UF membranes with improved antifouling capacity. [15][16][17][18] Among these materials, CNTs have gained signicant attention whether in laboratories or industries, owing to their rapid mass transport behavior caused by large surface area, in combination with excellent mechanical, electrical and thermal properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, use of nanotechnology for membrane fabrication is a new promising method to improve membrane performance through incorporation of nanomaterials [15]. The addition of nanoparticles can alter the membrane morphology, improve permeability and reduce fouling properties of membranes, due to their high specific surface area, chemical stability and feasible functionalization [16,17]. Nanocomposite membranes can be improved by assembling nanoparticles into membranes or blending them with organic or inorganic additives [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Molecular dynamics simulations on functionalized single-walled nanotubes have shown that presence of charges at the entrance of the pores function as a barrier and helps in prevention of passage of ions thus enhancing the ion rejection, with theoretical predictions being many times better than even the existing separation technologies. 25 However, it has also been reported that protein fouling behavior of PS composite membranes by bovine serum albumin and ovalbumin has been drastically reduced due to presence of nanotubes, 26 whereas modification on the CNT surface with 5-isocyanato-isophthaloyl chloride enhances the protein adsorption on the membrane. 27 One of the major concerns of membrane based separations is biofouling that leads to reduced water flux and selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%