2006
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200500228
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster: Large‐scale organization and robustness

Abstract: High-throughput screens have begun to reveal protein interaction networks in several organisms. To understand the general properties of these protein interaction networks, a systematic analysis of topological structure and robustness was performed on the protein interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. It shows that the three protein interaction networks have a scale-free and high-degree clustering nature as the consequence of their hierarchical orga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Network hubs are likely to play essential roles in the biological networks (5,26,41,48). Hubs are nodes with high connectivity to other nodes and can be identified via examining their contributions to network interconnectivity and diameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network hubs are likely to play essential roles in the biological networks (5,26,41,48). Hubs are nodes with high connectivity to other nodes and can be identified via examining their contributions to network interconnectivity and diameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the type of interacting nodes, the following networks can be distinguished: metabolic (Schuster et al, 2000), protein-protein interaction (Li et al, 2006), transcriptional regulation (Sato et al, 2010), and signaling networks (Liu et al, 2010). Depending upon the network, edges are either nondirectional or directed from one node to the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sequence similarity decides the first ortholog candidate in Ideker's system and OrthoInterBlast, sequence score also contributes to the final decision of the ortholog in OrthoInterBlast. It is because we want to reduce the effect of false positive interaction data (Li et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%