2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b03658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein–Ligand Interaction Energy-Based Entropy Calculations: Fundamental Challenges For Flexible Systems

Abstract: Entropy calculations represent one of the most challenging steps in obtaining the binding free energy in biomolecular systems. A novel computationally effective approach (IE) was recently proposed to calculate the entropy based on the computation of protein-ligand interaction energy directly from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We present a study focused on the application of this method to flexible molecular systems and compare its performance with well-established normal mode (NM) and quasiharmonic (QH)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the RP method, TP is used to estimate the free energy difference between state 2 and state 2′. As exponential averaging may face convergence problems, the Wu–Kofke Pi (П) value is used to check the convergence of TP corrections . As shown in the Supporting Information Table S1, all П values are larger than 0.5, which means the TP estimations are free of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the RP method, TP is used to estimate the free energy difference between state 2 and state 2′. As exponential averaging may face convergence problems, the Wu–Kofke Pi (П) value is used to check the convergence of TP corrections . As shown in the Supporting Information Table S1, all П values are larger than 0.5, which means the TP estimations are free of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, quite substantial differences in the resulting free energies of binding using NM and IE were encountered in several studies. 95,97,98 In a recent study of Sun et al, 97 entropy effects on the performance of endpoint methods of over 1,500 protein-ligand systems were assessed. The best correlation to the experimental binding affinities was gained with IE, whereas the absolute binding free energy values had the highest correspondence to experimental values using NM calculations.…”
Section: Force Field and Knowledge-based Scoring Methods For Ranking And To Predict Binding Affinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best correlation to the experimental binding affinities was gained with IE, whereas the absolute binding free energy values had the highest correspondence to experimental values using NM calculations. Recently, however, Kohut et al 98 proposed that the reproducibility of IE is less robust than that of NM or QH, especially for flexible systems. The calculated entropy value is mainly determined by the highest spikes of interaction energy and it is argued that the calculated entropies are difficult to converge as the simulations are prolonged.…”
Section: Force Field and Knowledge-based Scoring Methods For Ranking And To Predict Binding Affinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Binding energy consists of an enthalpic (sometimes referred to as a favourable) component and an entropic (sometimes referred to as an unfavourable) component. While many computational approaches are capable of accurately predicting changes in the enthalpic component, entropic contributions are more challenging to predict [31,32] and are often outright ignored [33,34]. The predicted loss in receptor binding affinity upon mutation of residues 3 and 12 is likely to be largely associated with a reduction in the enthalpic contribution to the binding energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%