2021
DOI: 10.1002/elps.202100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein mapping of peanut extract with capillary electrophoresis

Abstract: Protein separation can be achieved with different modes of capillary electrophoresis, such as with capillary gel electroporesis (CGE) or with capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). CZE protein mapping of peanut extract was approached in four different ways, combining neutral-coated or multilayer-coated capillaries with pHs well over or under the isoelectric point range of the proteins of interest. At acidic pHs, the mobility ranges of the major peanut allergens Ara h1, Ara h2, Ara h3, and Ara h6 were identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other techniques were used to assess properties of the SMIL coating, notably AFM and topography and recognition imaging (TREC) which showed the homogeneous surface, charge distribution, and reconstruction ability of the SMIL‐55 % PAMAMPS. Similarly, protein mapping of peanut extract was conducted with CZE by Villemet et al., [33] resulting in the characterization of major peanut allergens (Ara h1, Ara h2, Ara h3, Ara h6). A (PB/DS) 1.5 coating was used with a BGE made up of 100 mM phosphoric acid, 70 mM tris, and 3 g/L PS at pH 2.5, and the peaks were identified by comparison with Ara h standards.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other techniques were used to assess properties of the SMIL coating, notably AFM and topography and recognition imaging (TREC) which showed the homogeneous surface, charge distribution, and reconstruction ability of the SMIL‐55 % PAMAMPS. Similarly, protein mapping of peanut extract was conducted with CZE by Villemet et al., [33] resulting in the characterization of major peanut allergens (Ara h1, Ara h2, Ara h3, Ara h6). A (PB/DS) 1.5 coating was used with a BGE made up of 100 mM phosphoric acid, 70 mM tris, and 3 g/L PS at pH 2.5, and the peaks were identified by comparison with Ara h standards.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 not mentioned not mentioned 1.5 M acetic acid [43] Citric acid, lactic acid, 3-hydroxybutyric acid, pyroglutamic acid 3 > 200 not mentioned 6 (200 mM sodium phosphate) [33] Peanut allergens (Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6) RSD 0.16 7.0 (100 mM phosphate) [16] α-chymo A, Cyt C, Lyz, RNAse A RSD 17 % 2.5 (0.5 M acetic acid) PGLU [15] β-lac A, Lyz, Myo, RNAse A, TI 5 not mentioned À 54.9 RSD 1.5 % 2.5 (0.5 M acetic acid) P(lys,ser) HA [15] β-lac A, Lyz, Myo, RNAse A, TI…”
Section: Polyelectrolyte Naturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This could indicate adsorption to the capillary wall, which would be a problem, even more so for the dirtier cell culture medium samples. Neutral surfactants such as poloxamer 188, polysorbate 20, and polysorbate 80 could prevent adsorption [45]. The addition of these three surfactants in different concentrations to the BGE was tested.…”
Section: Bge Selection and Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%