2004
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Profiling of Microdissected Prostate Tissue Links Growth Differentiation Factor 15 to Prostate Carcinogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
70
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
70
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that protein expression profiles differ both between tumours with different histopathologic grades (Ware et al, 2003;Iwadate et al, 2004) and between different tumour stages (Cheung et al, 2004;Roblick et al, 2004). However, to our knowledge, the finding that the tumour protein expression profile changes over time in histologically identical tumours is novel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that protein expression profiles differ both between tumours with different histopathologic grades (Ware et al, 2003;Iwadate et al, 2004) and between different tumour stages (Cheung et al, 2004;Roblick et al, 2004). However, to our knowledge, the finding that the tumour protein expression profile changes over time in histologically identical tumours is novel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, RANKL down-regulated genes encoding proteasome 26S and ribophorin I, known to reduce the proteasomal degradation machinery (24,25) and GDF-15 that is associated with early prostate carcinogenesis (26). In addition, RANKL upregulated NF-IB which is potentially implicated in cell morphology and susceptibility to nuclear oncogenes (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous proteomic studies on prostate cancer have identified a number of alterations associated with the development of cancer (Ahram et al, 2002;Meehan et al, 2002;Schulz et al, 2003;Cheung et al, 2004), studies aimed specifically at identifying protein alterations associated with the metastatic progression are limited. A recent study has compared the protein profile of a highly metastatic human prostate cancer cell line M12 with its poorly tumorigenic variant M12(F6), and identified a reduced level of vimentin in the poorly tumorigenic variant (Liu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%