2012
DOI: 10.1021/bi201832a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein–Protein Interactions and Substrate Channeling in Orthologous and Chimeric Aldolase–Dehydrogenase Complexes

Abstract: Bacterial aldolase-dehydrogenase complexes catalyze the last steps in the meta cleavage pathway of aromatic hydrocarbon degradation. The aldolase (TTHB246) and dehydrogenase (TTHB247) from Thermus thermophilus were separately expressed and purified from recombinant Escherichia coli. The aldolase forms a dimer, while the dehydrogenase is a monomer; these enzymes can form a stable tetrameric complex in vitro, consisting of two aldolase and two dehydrogenase subunits. Upon complex formation, the K(m) value of 4-h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The k cat and K M of an enzyme may be altered by the formation of a protein complex. 20,21 For example, if PsUC and PsAH coordinate their activities during catalysis through either intermediate channeling or direct physical interactions, the presence of one enzyme could alter substrate access or catalytic turnover of the other, and thus alter its kinetic parameters. To assess this possibility, the overall kinetic parameters were determined for UC, AH, Figure 1.…”
Section: Psah and Psuc Do Not Influence Each Other's Enzyme Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The k cat and K M of an enzyme may be altered by the formation of a protein complex. 20,21 For example, if PsUC and PsAH coordinate their activities during catalysis through either intermediate channeling or direct physical interactions, the presence of one enzyme could alter substrate access or catalytic turnover of the other, and thus alter its kinetic parameters. To assess this possibility, the overall kinetic parameters were determined for UC, AH, Figure 1.…”
Section: Psah and Psuc Do Not Influence Each Other's Enzyme Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A) Representative chromatograms from size exclusion chromatography. In each case, a 200 lL injection of 1 mg mL 21 PsAH (dotted lines), 1 mg mL 21 PsUC (dashed lines) or preincubated 1 mg mL 21 PsAH/PsUC (solid lines) was applied to a superpose 6 HR 10/ 30 column. The elution peak at 15 mL corresponds to the predicted molecular weight for both the wild-type PsAH dimer (MW 5 130 kDa), and the PsUC monomer (MW 5 130 kDa).…”
Section: Psah and Psuc Do Not Influence Each Other's Enzyme Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trapping of a reaction intermediate that has been released to the solvent by a very fast reaction is one of the most rigorous tests for channeling. This approach has been used to measure the efficiency of channeling between the active sites of BphI and BphJ (36), dihydroxyacetone kinase and aldolase in a fused bifunctional enzyme (37), and orthologous and chimeric aldolasedehydrogenase complexes (38). In the latter case, channeling occurs in orthologous complexes, but not in chimeric complexes, even though stable complexes are formed in both cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient strategy employed by nature to sequester unstable intermediates along various biosynthetic pathways is by evolving separate enzymes with coupled reactions that are only active in consort as multiprotein complexes [1], [2]. On the other hand, in some instances analogous systems have emerged that retain these activities together via synthesis of the enzymes as a single polypeptide chain [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%