Protein structure model refinement in CASP12 using short and long molecular dynamics simulations in implicit solvent

Abstract

Protein structure prediction has matured over years, particularly those which use structure templates for building a model. It can build a model with correct overall conformation in cases where appropriate templates are available. Models with the correct topology can be practically useful for limited purposes that need residue-level accuracy, but further improvement of the models can allow the models to be used in tasks that need detailed structures, such as molecular replacement in X-ray crystallography or structure-based drug screening. Thus, model refinement is an important final step in protein structure prediction to bridge predictions to real-life applications. Model refinement is one of the categories in recent rounds of critical assessment of techniques in protein structure prediction (CASP) and has recently been drawing more attention due to its realized importance. Here we report our group's performance in the refinement category in CASP12. Our method is based on inexpensive short molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in implicit solvent. Our performance in CASP12 was among the top, which was consistent with the previous round, CASP11. Our method with short MD runs achieved comparable performance with other methods that used longer simulations. Detailed analyses found that improvements typically occurred in entire regions of a structure rather than only in flexible loop regions. The remaining challenge in the structure refinement includes large conformational refinement which involves substantial motions of secondary structure elements or domains.

Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?

“…In CASP8, 70% of the participants in an evaluation of protein structure refinement failed to improve agreement with experimental data compared to initial models [4]. In the last decade, access to more computational power led to an increase of the use of physics-based methods such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and force fields in protein structure prediction [5][6][7][8][9]. Whereas physics-based methods initially had very limited success in CASP, performance has improved in recent assessments.…”

ClusPro in rounds 38 to 45 of CAPRI: Toward combining template‐based methods with free docking

“…based on repeated molecular dynamics simulations, 38,39 at this time the approach is computationally too expensive to be implemented as a public server.…”

Performance and enhancement of the LZerD protein assembly pipeline in CAPRI 38‐46

“…This is a MD-based refinement method our group used in CASP13. Based on our group's CASP12 refinement protocol 64 , in this protocol we used the CHARMM22 force field with the FACTS 53 implicit solvent model in CHARMM 54 . Initially, the refinement target structure is put through minimization with all heavy atoms fixed, before being put through minimization with tapering harmonic restraints on all heavy atoms.…”