Protein Trafficking in Plant Cells 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5298-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein translocation into and across the chloroplastic envelope membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
2
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Protease-resistant fragments are called deg and classified into deg1, deg2, deg3, or deg4 based on different molecular sizes, from the largest (deg1) to the smallest (deg4). deg1 and deg2 were shown to cofractionate with the outer membrane, whereas deg3 and deg4, which would correspond to SSU-DPs in this study, were shown to cofractionate with the inner membrane (Waegemann and Soll, 1993;Soll and Tien, 1998), supporting our observations. Akita et al (1997) have shown that a translocation intermediate complex of ;600 kD could be isolated using chemical crosslinkers.…”
Section: Mbs As In (A)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Protease-resistant fragments are called deg and classified into deg1, deg2, deg3, or deg4 based on different molecular sizes, from the largest (deg1) to the smallest (deg4). deg1 and deg2 were shown to cofractionate with the outer membrane, whereas deg3 and deg4, which would correspond to SSU-DPs in this study, were shown to cofractionate with the inner membrane (Waegemann and Soll, 1993;Soll and Tien, 1998), supporting our observations. Akita et al (1997) have shown that a translocation intermediate complex of ;600 kD could be isolated using chemical crosslinkers.…”
Section: Mbs As In (A)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…(e) Targeting to the apicoplast In mitochondria and chloroplasts, considerable effort has been invested in identifying the mechanisms whereby nuclear-encoded proteins are imported across the one, two, or three membranes separating distinct organellar compartments from the cytosol (Pilon et al 1995;Cline & Henry 1996;Haucke & Schatz 1997;Martin & Hermann 1998;Soll & Tien 1998). Import signals are not well conserved, typically consisting of weakly basic amphipathic alpha helices; these N-terminal domains are cleaved upon import into the organelle.…”
Section: (D) Apicoplast Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, as noted above, there is no reliable method for recognizing nuclear-encoded apicoplast proteins (as is the case for proteins destined for mitochondria or chloroplasts): apicoplast-targeting signals are highly degenerate. Probable homologues of chloroplast proteins, known to be encoded in the nuclear genome of plants or algae (Cline & Henry 1996;Haucke & Schatz 1997;Soll & Tien 1998;Martin & Hermann 1998; include hundreds of candidate genes, including, for example, cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ribosomal proteins, in addition to their counterparts destined for the apicoplast. Similarly, predicted signal sequences may be found on proteins destined for the rhoptries, micronemes, dense granules, parasite plasma membrane, parasitophorous vacuole, or host cell ... in addition to nuclearencoded plastid proteins.…”
Section: (F ) But What Does the Apicoplast Do?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development and maintenance of specific plastid types in different tissues (e.g., chloroplasts in green tissues) relies on the import and assembly of several thousand different nucleus-encoded proteins (Soll and Tien, 1998;Chen and Schnell, 1999;Keegstra and Cline, 1999;Keegstra and Froehlich, 1999). This requires a remarkable flexibility in the import apparatus because the relative amounts and compositions of imported proteins vary considerably depending on the type and developmental stage of the particular plastid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no consensus for the length or sequence of transit peptides from different preproteins (von Heijne et al, 1989;von Heijne and Nishikawa, 1991;Bruce, 2001), original studies of the mechanism of protein import led to the proposal that transit peptides are functionally interchangeable (Mishkind et al, 1985;Van den Broeck et al, 1985;de Boer et al, 1991) and are recognized by a common, general protein import machinery (Soll and Tien, 1998). In chloroplasts, transit peptides are recognized by receptor components of the preprotein translocon at the outer envelope membrane of chloroplasts (Toc complex) (Hirsch et al, 1994;Perry and Keegstra, 1994;Schnell et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%