Although bulk protein turnover has been measured with the use of stable isotope labeled tracers for over half a century, it is only recently that the same approach has become applicable to the level of the proteome, permitting analysis of the turnover of many proteins instead of single proteins or an aggregated protein pool. The optimal experimental design for turnover studies is dependent on the nature of the biological system under study, which dictates the choice of precursor label, protein pool sampling strategy, and treatment of data. In this review we discuss different approaches and, in particular, explore how complexity in experimental design and data processing increases as we shift from unicellular to multicellular systems, in particular animals. The use of stable isotopes to trace metabolic processes, pioneered by Schoenheimer starting in 1935, elicited a paradigm shift in the perception of proteins, such that they were no longer considered as unchanging structural components of a cell that are replaced only when damaged by general "wear and tear" (1). These seminal studies introduced the concept of continual breakdown and re-synthesis as an ongoing metabolic process that truly reflects "The Dynamic State of Body Constituents" (2). This original work, which predates the discovery of the ribosome or the elucidation of the genetic code, placed protein turnover firmly in the category of highly active metabolic processes. In the ensuing period, huge progress has been made in clarification of the mechanisms of protein turnover, although our understanding of the subtleties of protein synthesis still exceeds our understanding of the corresponding destructive processes by which a protein is converted to constituent amino acids. Even now, it is difficult to describe the complete mechanistic details of the breakdown of any specific intracellular protein; we know the beginning (the mature protein), we know the end point (amino acids), and we may know some details of the intermediate processes (whether the protein is ubiquitylated prior to proteasomal degradation, whether the proteasome is involved, and so forth), but for most proteins, it is still not possible to define the exact route from specific intact protein to its pool of constituent amino acids. Part of the problem is that protein degradation is associated with a loss of tangibility; thus, loss of a band on a western blot is easy to observe, but monitoring of transiently existing intermediates in the process of degradation is rather difficult. Higher level questions, such as those posed in a recent review (3), define some of the challenges in the development of our understanding of proteome dynamics and may well require the development of new experimental approaches.It is (at least conceptually) convenient to distinguish between two distinct processes in the degradation of any protein: a commitment step and a completion step. The commitment step is the rate-limiting step and need not be proteolytic. For example, polyubiquitin conjugation and lysosomal in...