1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4838(98)00098-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteins in electric fields and pressure fields: basic aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b), which yield exactly the same results for both situations, namely 6.5 nm/GPa. Notice that at moderate pressure levels, the pressure shift of the fluorescence emission is supposed to be proportional to the solvent shift (31). This implies that, after denaturation, there is no significant influence of the protein on the chromophore.…”
Section: [1]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2b), which yield exactly the same results for both situations, namely 6.5 nm/GPa. Notice that at moderate pressure levels, the pressure shift of the fluorescence emission is supposed to be proportional to the solvent shift (31). This implies that, after denaturation, there is no significant influence of the protein on the chromophore.…”
Section: [1]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The electric field, F, affecting the electronic state of P is considered as a linear combination of the three vector components of the applied electric field (F a ), the pocket field due to the presence of apoproteins (F p ), and the electrostatic field induced by the presence of carotenoid (F c ) [48] (1)…”
Section: Theoretical Model To Analyze the Stark Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the idea to describe the electrostatic field as a summation of the applied and pocket fields has already been suggested [48], the F c term has been introduced additionally in order to clarify the effect of the presence of carotenoid.…”
Section: Theoretical Model To Analyze the Stark Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(ii) The dispersive (nonsingle exponential) hole-growth kinetics (HGK) that reflect structural heterogeneity (10). (iii) The permanent dipole moment change (⌬ ) of the S 0 3 S 1 transition that is obtained by measuring the response of the ZPH (broadening and͞or splitting) to an external electric (Stark) field (26). Here it is the matrix-induced contribution to ⌬ that is of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%