2010
DOI: 10.2174/138920310794109094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteins: Sequence to Structure and Function – Current Status

Abstract: In an era that has been dominated by Structural Biology for the last 30-40 years, a dramatic change of focus towards sequence analysis has spurred the advent of the genome projects and the resultant diverging sequence/structure deficit. The central challenge of Computational Structural Biology is therefore to rationalize the mass of sequence information into biochemical and biophysical knowledge and to decipher the structural, functional and evolutionary clues encoded in the language of biological sequences. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 225 publications
(200 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is frequently claimed and generally accepted that sequence divergence occurs more rapidly than 3D fold changes, and that consequently, primary sequence analyses are less sensitive than X-ray crystallographic data for the purpose of defining common protein origin for highly divergent members of a protein superfamily [Abramson and Wright, 2009;Sael et al, 2012;Shenoy and Jayaram, 2010]. While we agree that both methods can provide strong evidence for homology, we are not convinced that this generally accepted notion is correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It is frequently claimed and generally accepted that sequence divergence occurs more rapidly than 3D fold changes, and that consequently, primary sequence analyses are less sensitive than X-ray crystallographic data for the purpose of defining common protein origin for highly divergent members of a protein superfamily [Abramson and Wright, 2009;Sael et al, 2012;Shenoy and Jayaram, 2010]. While we agree that both methods can provide strong evidence for homology, we are not convinced that this generally accepted notion is correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The protein sequences were used to detect similarity or identity to infer related structural and functional information. [36] The question about the stability and the validity of the predicted structure always remains. Several structure validation tools and methods, based upon different criteria are available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 and 34). For whole-protein, ab initio structure prediction, 35 the limitations are thought to be due mainly to the size of the conformational spaces of the target macromolecular systems, 6,36 for which locating the global minimum-energy structures requires extensive search. By contrast, the current study has examined the possibility of errors in energy-based predictions due to biases introduced by differences in the extent of local sampling around conformers being compared in a search.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%