2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.13.039834
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteogenomic Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Subtypes

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer remains a significant public health problem with an ever-rising incidence of disease. Cancers of the pancreas are characterised by various molecular aberrations, including changes in the proteomics and genomics landscape of the tumour cells. There is a need, therefore, to identify the proteomic landscape of pancreatic cancer and the specific genomic and molecular alterations associated with disease subtypes. Here, we carry out an integrative bioinformatics analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These mutations are infrequent in cancers such as small cell carcinoma of the ovary (occurring in none of the 15 examined tumours), Ewing sarcoma (occurring in 3% of the 122 examined tumours) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (occurring in 5% of the 151 examined tumours). These exceptions reinforce the notion that there exist multiple MAPK pathway independent routes to oncogenesis [59][60][61][62][63] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These mutations are infrequent in cancers such as small cell carcinoma of the ovary (occurring in none of the 15 examined tumours), Ewing sarcoma (occurring in 3% of the 122 examined tumours) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (occurring in 5% of the 151 examined tumours). These exceptions reinforce the notion that there exist multiple MAPK pathway independent routes to oncogenesis [59][60][61][62][63] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…MAPK1 (p = 4.82 × 10 −15 ), MAPK3 (p = 6.56 × 10 −14 ), MAPK8 (p = 1.71 × 10 −10 ), and MAPK14 (p = 2.68 × 10 −07 ; Figure 4c and Figure 5, also see Supplementary File 4). The MAPK pathway genes are altered in cervical cancers, and among other human cancers in which the MAPKs are the chief signal transduction proteins that regulate oncogenic behaviour such as cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell survival, cancer metastasis, and resistance to drug therapy [3640]. Accordingly, we suggest that the MAPK signalling pathways may present inflexion points for targeted therapies aimed at successfully treating HPV associated cervical cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…the top-ten predicted regulatory kinases ranked according to their combined statistical score based on the number of substrates they phosphorylate within a protein-protein interaction subnetwork. Shown along the columns of the plot are proteins which are the substrates for kinases along the rows.MAPK1 (p = 4.82 x 10 -15 ), MAPK3 (p = 6.56 x 10 -14 ), MAPK8 (p = 1.71 x 10 -10 ), and MAPK14 (p = 2.68 x 10 -07 ;Figure 4candFigure 5, also see Supplementary File 4).The MAPK pathway genes are altered in cervical cancers, and among other human cancers in which the MAPKs are the chief signal transduction proteins that regulate oncogenic behaviour such as cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell survival, cancer metastasis, and resistance to drug therapy[36][37][38][39][40]. Accordingly, we suggest that the MAPK signalling pathways may present inflexion points for targeted therapies aimed at successfully treating HPV associated cervical cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data get by these large cancer profiling projects have guided the identification of frequently altered cancer genes and the cancer type-specific regulators. Additionally, large-scale drug response screening projects, such as the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) project [ 16 ], have been valuable in providing well-characterised cancer cell lines as models of disease for both drug discovery and the evaluation of drug action dependencies of cancer cells [ 17 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%