2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteogenomic Characterization of Human Early-Onset Gastric Cancer

Abstract: Graphical AbstractHighlights d Mutation-phosphorylation correlation suggests possible signaling interplays in EOGCs d mRNA-protein correlation suggests genes with high association with patient survival d Integrated analysis of mRNA and protein data identified four subtypes d Phosphorylation data provide cellular signaling pathways underlying the subtypes SUMMARYWe report proteogenomic analysis of diffuse gastric cancers (GCs) in young populations. Phosphoproteome data elucidated signaling pathways associated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
204
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
8
204
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is achieved by simultaneously performing whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)-based shotgun proteomics analysis on matched samples, producing customized, sample-specific protein databases from DNA, and/or RNA sequencing data, and then searching MS/MS data against the customized protein databases. In contrast to proteomics data analysis that relies on reference protein databases alone, this approach allows the identification of peptides not included in reference protein databases, providing new opportunities to improve protein-coding genome annotation 4,5 and to identify disease-specific protein sequences [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved by simultaneously performing whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)-based shotgun proteomics analysis on matched samples, producing customized, sample-specific protein databases from DNA, and/or RNA sequencing data, and then searching MS/MS data against the customized protein databases. In contrast to proteomics data analysis that relies on reference protein databases alone, this approach allows the identification of peptides not included in reference protein databases, providing new opportunities to improve protein-coding genome annotation 4,5 and to identify disease-specific protein sequences [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the GC proteomic landscape, our understanding is still rudimentary. Of note are two recent large‐scale proteomic studies focused on DGC, which independently delineated subtypes of potential prognostic and therapeutic value . Nonetheless, these studies remain to be rigorously validated owing to the general lack of comprehensive proteomic datasets.…”
Section: Multifaceted Molecular Classification Of Gcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, massive efforts have been put forth to prioritize the functional importance of phosphorylation sites (54,55) as well as decipher correlation between mutation and phosphorylation in cancer (75). For this reason, we compiled a curated list of susceptible nullomer-making phosphosites retrieved from PhosphoSite Plus database (36).…”
Section: Peptide Nullomers and Nullomer-making Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%