“…29 In this review, we explore several F I G U R E 1 Structural schematic of identified ENaC CAPs. CAP1 (Prss8, prostasin), 4,5 CAP2 (Tmprss4), 6 CAP3 (St14/Matriptase), 6 Tmprss3, 7 Tmprss2, 8,9 uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator), 10,11 plasminogen, [12][13][14][15] trypsin, 16 chymotrypsin, 14 tissue 17,18 and plasma kallikrein, 19 elastase, 20 furin, 21 factor VII activating protease, 22 cathepsin B, 23,24 cathepsin S, 14 meprin β 25 and serralysin. 26 Predicted structural domains of mouse proteases are indicated 27 : CUB, complement C1r/C2s, urchin embryonic growth factor, bone morphogenic protein 1; EGF, epidermal growth factor-like; apple; kringle; GPI, glycophosphatidylinositol anchor; LDL-A, low density lipoprotein A; MAM, meprin, A5 protein, receptor protein phosphatase μ; MATH, meprin and TRAF-C homology; P/Homo B, paired basic amino acid residue-cleaving enzyme/homo sapiens B; PAN, PAN/apple; SEA, sperm protein, enterokinase and agrin; SRCR, scavenger receptor cysteine-rich; TM, transmembrane questions: how these proteases modulate ENaC function mechanistically, whether ENaC activation is dependent on its proteolytic cleavage, whether this proteolytic activity is essential in vivo and to which extent a loss-or gain-of-function of proteases in mice determines ENaCmediated Na + losing or retaining phenotypes.…”