1996
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.980121.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteolytic activity in the maize pollen wall

Abstract: S. 1996. Proteolylic activity in the maize pollen wali, -Physiol. Plant, 98: i72-17S, A new protease from maize {Zea may.'; L,) pollen is described. It was purified using gel filtration, ion exchange and high performance liquid ehromatography, SDS-PAGE and HPLC showed that the enzyme ha,s a dimeric stracture of M, ca 60 000, Inhibitor investigations indicated an aspartic acid residue in it,s active site. The optimum pH for maize pollen aspartic proteinase activity was 5,6, and the optimum temperature was 45°C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter of these might serve to properly sculpt the pollen surface and play a role in pollen hydration, germination or even pollination speci®city. In support of this contention, it has recently been demonstrated that some of the major protein components of Brassica napus pollen are derived from extracellular cleavage of precursor proteins (Murphy and Ross 1998), that proteolytic activity can be detected in the maize pollen wall (Radlowski et al 1996), and that the LIM9 proteinase is secreted into the anther locule (Taylor et al 1997). The second potential function for proteinases centers on their presumptive role in meiotic purging (Dickinson 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter of these might serve to properly sculpt the pollen surface and play a role in pollen hydration, germination or even pollination speci®city. In support of this contention, it has recently been demonstrated that some of the major protein components of Brassica napus pollen are derived from extracellular cleavage of precursor proteins (Murphy and Ross 1998), that proteolytic activity can be detected in the maize pollen wall (Radlowski et al 1996), and that the LIM9 proteinase is secreted into the anther locule (Taylor et al 1997). The second potential function for proteinases centers on their presumptive role in meiotic purging (Dickinson 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Partial inhibition of proteinase activity has been reported for several plant proteinases (e.g. Radlowski et al 1996;Disterano et al 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…6). In vitro addition of fresh corn pollen without E-64 into the proteinase reaction mixture did not affect the overall proteinase activity (data not shown), although the presence of proteinases in corn pollen has been reported (Radlowski et al, 1996). It is suggested that the reduction of E-64 potency after incubation with corn pollen may be due to interaction with other chemical or enzymatic factors in the pollen.…”
Section: March 2003mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In Brassica napus new peptides appeared, probably as a result of protein-protein interaction after mixing crude extracts from pistils and pollen (Doughty et al 1993). New peptides formed after this interaction may also be the effects of protease activities, which was previously suggested by Rad³owski et al (1996) and subsequently by Kalinowski et al (2001). In stigmas of grasses after pollination the intensity of protein synthesis was observed (Linskens 1973(Linskens , 1976.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the obtained data show an exceptionally poor picture of the low-molecularweight fraction on chromatograms for stigmas both treated and untreated with pollen enzymes. This fact might prove once again that pollen proteases have high specific activities and hydrolyze a protein chain only at 1-2 amino acids (Matheson et al 1995;Rad³owski et al 1996). It explains also the appearance of new polypeptides on 2-D electrophoregrams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%