1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07279.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteolytic Conversion of Angiotensins in Rat Brain Tissue

Abstract: The proteolytic conversion of angiotensins in rat brain preparations was studied. Angiotensin 1 was converted into angiotensin I1 by enzymes which were associated with a synaptic membrane preparation, while angiotensin I1 was relatively resistant to proteolysis by these enzymes. Angiotensin I1 was rapidly metabolized at both pH 7.4 and pH 5.4 by enzymes in the soluble fraction of a synaptosomal preparation. One of the fragments formed at pH 7.4 was characterized as angiotensin 111. At pH 5.4 only one fragment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…by guest on May 8, 2018 http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from does not cause pressor or drinking responses, 30 it has been proposed that the heptapeptide acts as a subset of angiotensin receptors. In the rabbit vas deferens, Trachte et al 27 showed that, unlike Ang II and Ang-(2-8), Ang-(l-7) had no direct vasoconstrictor activity and did not alter release of norepinephrine even though it was a potent stimulus for PGE release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by guest on May 8, 2018 http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from does not cause pressor or drinking responses, 30 it has been proposed that the heptapeptide acts as a subset of angiotensin receptors. In the rabbit vas deferens, Trachte et al 27 showed that, unlike Ang II and Ang-(2-8), Ang-(l-7) had no direct vasoconstrictor activity and did not alter release of norepinephrine even though it was a potent stimulus for PGE release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We favor this latter hypothesis because the actions of the two peptides are not always identical. For example, although both Ang II and Ang-(l-7) cause vasopressin release 21 and produce cardiovascular effects in the dorsal medulla, Ang-(1-7) is devoid of dipsogenic actions 22 and does not produce pressor responses after injections into the brain ventricles. Additionally, the potentiation of the response to Ang-(l-7) after denervation may also reflect the presence of different receptors for the two peptides, possibly situated on different parts of the neuronal circuits comprising the baroreceptor reflex arc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 An early study reported pressor effects in humans in vivo but used such large doses that it was regarded as confirmation of biological inactivity (0.028% of the activity of Ang II). 3 It has since emerged that Ang-(1-7) is biologically active in the central nervous system 4 and indeed in the circulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%