19th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/cbms.2006.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteome Profiling without Selection Bias

Abstract: In this paper, we present a method for predictive profiling of mass spectrometry data. The method integrates a spectra preprocessing pipeline with a complete validation setup aimed at identifying the discriminating peaks and at providing an unbiased estimate of the predictive classification error, based on SVM classifiers and on Entropy-based RFE procedure. A particular emphasis is placed upon avoiding selection bias effects throughout all the analysis steps, from preprocessing to peak importance ranking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise visual inspection of Fig.3 gives us useful information about the spectrum. Without any pre-processing and analysis, it can obviously be seen that: l. In last third of the MSII, there are no valuable information (this result is previously reported using complicated feature extraction and selection procedures [17,5,15,16,22]). 2.…”
Section: A a Novel Data Representation/or Msdmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precise visual inspection of Fig.3 gives us useful information about the spectrum. Without any pre-processing and analysis, it can obviously be seen that: l. In last third of the MSII, there are no valuable information (this result is previously reported using complicated feature extraction and selection procedures [17,5,15,16,22]). 2.…”
Section: A a Novel Data Representation/or Msdmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…They achieved accuracy of 100% using these 10 features. There are some other works that all of them didn't reach perfect classification [16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Dataset and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%