2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic and functional analyses of the venom of Porthidium lansbergii lansbergii (Lansberg's hognose viper) from the Atlantic Department of Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies on the proteomic characterization of venoms are increasingly combining identification data with functional assays of particular components, to gain deeper insights from the medical and biological perspectives [57, 8385]. The TS is conceptually identical to the ‘lethal neurotoxicity coefficient’ (LNC) defined as the ratio between the average LD 50 and the crotoxin + crotamine relative abundance (% of the total venom proteins) [50].…”
Section: Toxicovenomics: Unmasking the Villains Among The Crowdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on the proteomic characterization of venoms are increasingly combining identification data with functional assays of particular components, to gain deeper insights from the medical and biological perspectives [57, 8385]. The TS is conceptually identical to the ‘lethal neurotoxicity coefficient’ (LNC) defined as the ratio between the average LD 50 and the crotoxin + crotamine relative abundance (% of the total venom proteins) [50].…”
Section: Toxicovenomics: Unmasking the Villains Among The Crowdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found a singleton (BC32, 0.3 % of total toxins) encoding a phosphodiesterase, which showed 81 % identity with a phosphodiesterase from Ovophis okinavensis . Several transcriptomic and proteomic studies reported the expression of these toxins in various snakes [ 24 , 65 , 84 88 ]. However, the function of these enzymes during envenomation remains unclear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snake toxin genes are coded by gene families and produce gene isoforms through the process of duplications ( Casewell et al, 2013 ; Fry, 2005 ). Several studies on the venom-associated proteins from New World vipers have classified the venoms into four groups (type I–IV), based on the relative abundance of toxin families ( Calvete, 2013 ; Gibbs et al, 2013 ; Goncalves-Machado et al, 2016 ; Jimenez-Charris et al, 2015 ; Lomonte et al, 2014 ; Mora-Obando et al, 2014 ; Pla et al, 2017 ; Salazar-Valenzuela et al, 2014 ). The different groups are: snake venom metalloproteinase-predominant (type I), heterodimeric β -neurotoxic PLA2 –rich (type II), serine proteinases and PLA2 (type III) and type IV, which is similar to type III but with significant higher concentration of snake venom metalloproteinases ( Calvete, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%