2022
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.b2100930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic characterization of four subtypes of M2 macrophages derived from human THP-1 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the lowest confusion was noted between M0, M2b, M1, and M2d, while the highest confusion was between M0, M2c, and M2a. A similarity between M0, M2a, and M2c comparing to M1 were previously reported in gene expression and proteomics studies 51 53 . Our findings suggest that macrophage phenotypes have a detectable unique autofluorescence which allows label-free macrophage identification, however, it should be expected that when simultaneously comparing six phenotypes, some phenotypes are more distinguishable than the others possibly due to the differences in the biological characteristics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Overall, the lowest confusion was noted between M0, M2b, M1, and M2d, while the highest confusion was between M0, M2c, and M2a. A similarity between M0, M2a, and M2c comparing to M1 were previously reported in gene expression and proteomics studies 51 53 . Our findings suggest that macrophage phenotypes have a detectable unique autofluorescence which allows label-free macrophage identification, however, it should be expected that when simultaneously comparing six phenotypes, some phenotypes are more distinguishable than the others possibly due to the differences in the biological characteristics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Overall, the lowest confusion was noted between M0, M2b, M1, and M2d, while the highest confusion was between M0, M2c, and M2a. A similarity between M0, M2a, and M2c comparing to M1 were previously reported in gene expression and proteomics studies [49][50][51] . Our ndings suggest that macrophage phenotypes have a detectable unique auto uorescence which allows label-free macrophage identi cation, however, it should be expected that when simultaneously comparing six phenotypes, some phenotypes are more distinguishable than the others possibly due to the differences in the biological characteristics.…”
Section: Macrophage Classi Cation Accuracy Applying Machine Learningsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These differences may influence intracellular drug concentrations between these two cell subsets. In another study, ABCB1 expression levels were elevated in M2a subtype macrophages, which participate in the role of phospholipids in phagocytosis and retinoic acid-mediated signal transduction [23]. In addition, ABCC1 (MRP1) was shown to be upregulated in M1 macrophages, whereas ABCG2 (BCRP) expression was upregulated in M2 polarized macrophages [24].…”
Section: The Innate Immune Systemmentioning
confidence: 94%