2012
DOI: 10.2174/138945012803530080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic Classification of Breast Cancer

Abstract: Being a significant health problem that affects patients in various age groups, breast cancer has been extensively studied to date. Recently, molecular breast cancer classification has advanced significantly with the availability of genomic profiling technologies. Proteomic technologies have also advanced from traditional protein assays including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry to more comprehensive approaches including mass spectrometry and reverse phase protein lysa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the number of distinct subtypes is increasing steadily as multiple data types are integrated. Integration of genome copy number and transcriptional profiles defines 10 subtypes [3], and adding mutation status [4], methylation pattern [5], pattern of splice variants [6], protein and phosphoprotein expression [7] and microRNA expression and pathway activity [8] may define still more subtypes. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project and other international genomics efforts were founded to improve our understanding of the molecular landscapes of most major tumor types with the ultimate goal of increasing the precision with which individual cancers are managed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of distinct subtypes is increasing steadily as multiple data types are integrated. Integration of genome copy number and transcriptional profiles defines 10 subtypes [3], and adding mutation status [4], methylation pattern [5], pattern of splice variants [6], protein and phosphoprotein expression [7] and microRNA expression and pathway activity [8] may define still more subtypes. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project and other international genomics efforts were founded to improve our understanding of the molecular landscapes of most major tumor types with the ultimate goal of increasing the precision with which individual cancers are managed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact recently, patient data from the cancer genome atlas project (TCGA) presented the differential methylation status of Rab25 between luminal and basal subtypes of breast cancer with significant increase in methylation in the latter group (unpublished). Furthermore, with the reevaluation of molecular features of intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer and emergence of the new “claudin low” group within the basal category (exemplified by the MDA MB231 cell line), we find that Rab25 levels are concomitantly undetectable along with low claudin levels in these mesenchymal breast cancer subtypes, clinically closest to metaplastic breast cancers 22,23 . So it is safe to conclude that in breast cancers, the oncogenic role of Rab25 is context dependent.…”
Section: 0 Context Dependent Role Of Rab25 In Cancer: Oncogene or Tmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is important to note that breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, populated by diverse cells types 22,23 . Each molecular subtype has distinct gene expression profiles and overall outcome.…”
Section: 0 Context Dependent Role Of Rab25 In Cancer: Oncogene or Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We crossed HER2/neu-overexpressing (MMTV-neu-IRES-cre, or NIC) mice with PTEN fl/fl mice (PTEN −/− / NIC), which developed highly aggressive neu-overexpressing/PTEN-deficient and trastuzumab-resistant mammary tumors with median survival of 45 days [13]. We applied a quantitative proteomics approach of reverse phase protein array (RPPA, containing > 150 antibodies) [18] on lysates of mammary tumors from the PTEN −/− / NIC mice and compared it to the PTEN +/+ /NIC (PTEN wild type) tumors. As with patient tumors, tumors of the PTEN −/− /NIC mice had activation of not only the PI3K Figure 1C) [19].…”
Section: Biomarker Analyses Denote Activation Of Multiple Erbb2 Downsmentioning
confidence: 99%