2024
DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.06.592788
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic Profiling of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Impact of Isolation Methods on Protein Cargo

Morteza Abyadeh,
Shahab Mirshahvaladi,
Sara Assar Kashani
et al.

Abstract: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized vesicles with a lipid bilayer that are secreted by cells and play a critical role in cell-to-cell communication. Despite the promising reports regarding their diagnostic and therapeutic potential, the utilization of EVs in the clinical setting is limited due to insufficient information about their cargo and a lack of standardization in isolation and analysis methods. Considering protein cargos in EVs as key contributors to their therapeutic potency, we conducted a tan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 132 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daps for each EV subpopulation were identified using one-way ANOVA followed by a multiple comparison analysis with Tukey's multiple comparison test in SPSS (26.0), and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant herein instead of doing multiple test correction analysis; we used log2 fold change cutoff > |0.263| as the additional criteria of defining DAPs 16 . EVs were classified into three different subpopulations with different sizes and size distributions that were isolated through different isolation methods, including high-speed centrifuge (HS-EVs) with higher size distribution ranging from 50-1500 nm, ultracentrifuge (UC-EVs) with size distribution ranging from 100-300 nm and ultracentrifugation on sucrose cushion (SU-EVs) with size distribution of 300-1500 nm 16 . The EV subpopulation was compared in binary mode, and we included two-sided comparisons to facilitate comparison with AD data.…”
Section: Proteome Dataset Selection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daps for each EV subpopulation were identified using one-way ANOVA followed by a multiple comparison analysis with Tukey's multiple comparison test in SPSS (26.0), and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant herein instead of doing multiple test correction analysis; we used log2 fold change cutoff > |0.263| as the additional criteria of defining DAPs 16 . EVs were classified into three different subpopulations with different sizes and size distributions that were isolated through different isolation methods, including high-speed centrifuge (HS-EVs) with higher size distribution ranging from 50-1500 nm, ultracentrifuge (UC-EVs) with size distribution ranging from 100-300 nm and ultracentrifugation on sucrose cushion (SU-EVs) with size distribution of 300-1500 nm 16 . The EV subpopulation was compared in binary mode, and we included two-sided comparisons to facilitate comparison with AD data.…”
Section: Proteome Dataset Selection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%