2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2004.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProTest: An Automatic Test Environment for B Specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 presents the same information for the improved and randomization experiments, which always lead to the same number of tests since the test data randomization feature does not concern test scenarios generation. In both charts, it is possible to see the 5 Amount of the test cases generated by BETA in the original experiment of the b2llvm and C4B case study. Bar charts with the amount of infeasible test cases and negative and positive feasible test cases generated by BETA in the original experiment of the b2llvm and C4B case study Fig.…”
Section: Test Case Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6 presents the same information for the improved and randomization experiments, which always lead to the same number of tests since the test data randomization feature does not concern test scenarios generation. In both charts, it is possible to see the 5 Amount of the test cases generated by BETA in the original experiment of the b2llvm and C4B case study. Bar charts with the amount of infeasible test cases and negative and positive feasible test cases generated by BETA in the original experiment of the b2llvm and C4B case study Fig.…”
Section: Test Case Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These requirements are made of operations to cover and predicates that must hold true at the end of each test case. In [5], the authors presented a simple case study to evaluate ProTest and discuss theoretical differences concerning other approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One is the commercial LEIROS tool [13], based on the former BZ-testing tool [7], which is rooted in constraint logic programming to find boundary values. The other approach [18,19] uses ProB [17] -itself also rooted in constraint logic programming -and is based on adding tautologies (e.g., x=∅ or x≠∅) to guards and the invariant and then uses the disjunctive normal form (DNF) to partition the executed operations according to the particular disjuncts covered. Traces are generated which try to cover every operation in every reachable partition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%