Many years ago, when I lived in pre-revolutionary Tehran as an expat teenager, American Forces Radio and Television Service (AFRTS) was the only television channel I could watch and understand. There was a recurring advertisement, which targeted its actual audience to encourage them to move to one or another state in the United States, once their service time had come to an end. Of course, the states advertised were not New York or California, but rather more obscure and admittedly less attractive destinations. The motto was always the same: "Oklahomaor Alabama, or New Mexico, or Oregona nice place to visit, a great place to live." This is what inspired the title of this epilogue, originally delivered as a keynote address in Amsterdam. 1 Obviously, the context is quite different, but for whatever reason this phrase had somehow stuck in my mind, and it immediately popped up when I started to write this piece. Yet my take was at the reverse of the logic behind the American message of the 1970s. Instead of a crescendo from a nice place to visit to a great place to live, my argument was based on the contrast and opposition between the Ottoman lands and Turkey as an attractive destination for visitors and a difficult place to live for its own subjects or citizens.I believe this contrast sums up one of the dominant contradictions of demographic and human flows between these lands and the rest of the world. A pole of attraction for so many visitors and temporary residents, it remains a place where a prolonged, let alone permanent, settlement is perceived with anxiety and often triggers a feeling of being trapped. Interestingly, the present and very recent past have witnessed a very considerable rise in phenomena that one is likely to link to one form or another of exile. Intuitively, I believe that the proportion of Ottoman subjects and Turkish citizens who may have experienced exile is high. One could musingly adapt the Koranic saying that everyone will taste death and claim that every Ottoman/Turk has