1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990611)84:5<389::aid-ajmg1>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteus syndrome: Diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and patient evaluation

Abstract: Proteus syndrome is a complex disorder comprising malformations and overgrowth of multiple tissues. The disorder is highly variable and appears to affect patients in a mosaic manner. This intrinsic variability has led to diagnostic confusion associated with a dearth of longitudinal data on the natural history of Proteus syndrome. To clarify some of these issues, a workshop on Proteus syndrome was held in March 1998 at the National Institutes of Health, and participants developed recommendations for diagnostic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
315
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
315
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of clinically significant arteriovenous shunting distinguishes KTS from Parkes-Weber syndrome. 26 Exact incidence and pathogenesis is still unknown. Diagnosis is purely clinical.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of clinically significant arteriovenous shunting distinguishes KTS from Parkes-Weber syndrome. 26 Exact incidence and pathogenesis is still unknown. Diagnosis is purely clinical.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Again, these criteria are controversial so it is appropriate to review the history and rationale for their generation. Previous attempts have been made to develop criteria, although these have been supplanted by more recent efforts.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meeting conferees reviewed the data on a large number of patients (published and unpublished) and distilled those data into a set of diagnostic criteria. 6 The diagnostic criteria have two categories of attributes; general and specific. The general attributes delineate the nonspecific features of PS by requiring that all patients have a mosaic distribution of the phenotype, are sporadic and the manifestations are progressive in nature.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of clinically significant arteriovenous shunting distinguishes KTS from Parkes-Weber syndrome. 7 The triad of capillary malformations (port wine stain), varicosities or venous malformations and limb hypertrophy have been found to occur in 98%, 72%, and 67% of patients, respectively, in a reported series of 252 patients. 8 The cause of KTS is still unclear.…”
Section: Congenital Venous Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%