Abstract:A catalytic and stereoselective glycosylation of various glycosyl acceptors, such as methyl glycosides, thioglycosides, or a disarmed glycosyl fluoride, with benzyl-protected armed glycosyl fluoride was successfully carried out by using various protic acids in the presence of MS 5A. In the cases when trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) or perchloric acid (HClO4) was used in diethyl ether (Et2O), α-glycosides were obtained as major products, while β-stereoselectivity was observed when tetrakis(pentafluoropheny… Show more
“…[21] The reaction was also performed with a carbohydrate alcohol. Allowing the imidates 7 and 8 to compete for methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-α--glucopyranoside (9) [22] catalyzed by TMSOTf at 0°C gave a 1:1 ratio of the glucoside 10 [23,24] and galactoside 11 [25,26] (Scheme 4) predominantly as β-glycosides. The triflate effect is thus also observed in disaccharide synthesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Products 3, [15] 4, 5, [16] 6, [17] 10, [23,24] 11, [25,26] 15, [33] and 20 [32] were made as reference compounds by known methods. Reference compounds 18, 19, and 21 were made as described below.…”
The difference in the electron-withdrawing powers of axial and equatorial OBn was used as a probe to investigate the glycosidation reaction. The reactivity of perbenzylated glucosyl and galactosyl donors were compared under a range of glycosidation conditions that involved variations in catalyst, solvent, and glycosyl acceptor. Generally, the galactosyl donor had a reactivity four to five times higher than the glu-
“…[21] The reaction was also performed with a carbohydrate alcohol. Allowing the imidates 7 and 8 to compete for methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-α--glucopyranoside (9) [22] catalyzed by TMSOTf at 0°C gave a 1:1 ratio of the glucoside 10 [23,24] and galactoside 11 [25,26] (Scheme 4) predominantly as β-glycosides. The triflate effect is thus also observed in disaccharide synthesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Products 3, [15] 4, 5, [16] 6, [17] 10, [23,24] 11, [25,26] 15, [33] and 20 [32] were made as reference compounds by known methods. Reference compounds 18, 19, and 21 were made as described below.…”
The difference in the electron-withdrawing powers of axial and equatorial OBn was used as a probe to investigate the glycosidation reaction. The reactivity of perbenzylated glucosyl and galactosyl donors were compared under a range of glycosidation conditions that involved variations in catalyst, solvent, and glycosyl acceptor. Generally, the galactosyl donor had a reactivity four to five times higher than the glu-
“…19 These facts prompted the following question: which species is the real catalyst of this reaction: 8 or 10? To clarify the actual catalytic species experimentally, we utilized the properties of molecular sieves: acidic 5A MS 20 and basic 4A and 3A MS. 21,22 Table 2 summarizes the results of comparative experiments using the acidic and basic MS.…”
A completely β-selective glycosylation that does not rely on neighboring group participation is described. The novelty of this work is the design of the glycosyl donor locked into the axial-rich form by the o-xylylene bridge between the 3-O and 6-O of d-glucopyranose. The synthesized 2,4-di-O-benzyl-3,6-O-(o-xylyene)glucopyranosyl fluoride could efficiently react with various alcohols in a SnCl(2)-AgB(C(6)F(5))(4) catalytic system. The mechanism composed of the glycosylation and isomerization cycles was revealed through comparative experiments using acidic and basic molecular sieves. The achieved perfect stereocontrol is attributed to the synergy of the axial-rich conformation and convergent isomerization caused by HB(C(6)F(5))(4) generated in situ.
“…Donors bearing electron donating protective groups have much higher anomeric reactivities towards a promoter than those bearing electron withdrawing and conformational restricting protective groups. This phenomenon was first observed with the glycosyl halides,3 which has been subsequently found to be general for a variety of donors including pentenyl glycosides,4 thioglycosides,2, 5, 6 glycosyl fluorides,7 glycosyl thioimidates8 and glycosyl sulfoxides 9. The understanding of protective group effect on glycosylation rate led to the development of reactivity based chemoselective glycosylation method, where a thioglycoside donor with higher anomeric reactivity (armed) is mixed together with a less reactive (disarmed) thioglycosyl acceptor 2, 6.…”
Summary
Three series of thioglycosyl donors differing only in their respective aglycon substituents within each series have been prepared as representatives of typical glycosyl donors. The relative anomeric reactivities of these donors were quantified under competitive glycosylation conditions with various reaction time, promoters, solvents and acceptors. Over three orders of magnitude reactivity difference were generated by simple transformation of the para-substituent on the aglycon with methanol as the acceptor, while chemoselectivities became lower with carbohydrate acceptors. Excellent linear correlations were attained between relative reactivity values of donors and σp values of the substituents in the Hammett plots. This indicates that the glycosylation mechanism remains the same over a wide range of reactivities and glycosylation conditions. The negative slopes of the Hammett plots suggested that electron donating substituents expedite the reactions and the magnitudes of slopes can be rationalized by neighboring group participation as well as electronic properties of the glycon protective groups. Within the same series of donors, less nucleophilic acceptors gave smaller slopes in their Hammett plots. This is consistent with the notion that acceptor nucleophilic attack onto the reactive intermediate is part of the rate limiting step of the glycosylation reaction.
Excellent linear Hammett correlations were obtained between relative reactivity values of three series of donors differing only in their aglycon substituents and σp values of the substituents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.