2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2019.125709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protist Interactions and Community Structure During Early Autumn in the Kerguelen Region (Southern Ocean)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The wide spectrum of infection suggested for Syndiniales Group I might indicate low host-specificity and explain why we found this group associated with all zooplankton (Sassenhagen et al 2020;Guillou et al 2008). An alternative explanation for the presence of Group I in all zooplankton groups is based on previous investigations where Syndiniales Group I was found associated with cercozoans (Dolven et al 2007;Clarke et al 2019;Sassenhagen et al 2020), taxa that we found often abundant both in the water and associated with all zooplankton (Fig. 1a, c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wide spectrum of infection suggested for Syndiniales Group I might indicate low host-specificity and explain why we found this group associated with all zooplankton (Sassenhagen et al 2020;Guillou et al 2008). An alternative explanation for the presence of Group I in all zooplankton groups is based on previous investigations where Syndiniales Group I was found associated with cercozoans (Dolven et al 2007;Clarke et al 2019;Sassenhagen et al 2020), taxa that we found often abundant both in the water and associated with all zooplankton (Fig. 1a, c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This suggests that the wide spectrum of infection of Group I is potentially linked to the ingestion of cercozoan by all zooplankton consumers. However, it has recently been suggested that Syndiniales Group I might infect diatoms, and Syndiniales associated with Cercozoa might be the result of predation on infected diatoms (Sassenhagen et al 2020), emphasizing the high complexity of the biotic interactions that we found in plankton communities. Our observations might also support this hypothesis because diatoms were shared as prey by all the zooplankton consumers (Zamora-Terol et al 2020), in particular Thalassiosira, one of the genera suggested by Sassenhagen et al 2020 to be infected by Syndiniales Group I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In particular, Eucampia antarctica cells and CRS observed above the plateau were not silicifying and likely corresponded to a remnant population that accumulated at the base of the mixed layer prior to the cruise. The relatively low percentage of crunched frustules (5 ± 3 %) suggests that selective grazing had little impact on shaping communities, while parasites could have controlled population dynamics prior to the cruise since elevated relative abundances of free Syndiniales spores was suggested by environmental sequencing (Sassenhagen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Kerguelen Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive interactions that were detected between these groups remain ambiguous, as there has yet to be empirical evidence of Syndiniales infecting diatoms. However, Syndiniales have been shown to positively associate with diatoms in other co-occurrence networks or single-cell studies (15,16,66), and diatoms are known hosts of other parasitic protists and fungi (8,47), which warrants further investigation into their infection dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional omics tools, such as transcriptomics, may be used to inform in situ parasitehost interactions, distinguishing between different stages of Syndiniales (e.g., intracellular trophont versus free-living dinospores) based on patterns in gene expression and testing how core genes involved in parasitic infection (e.g., host recognition or attachment) may be differentially expressed under certain abiotic or biotic conditions (69). Indeed, 18S profiling of a larger size fraction (e.g., Ͻ200 m) cannot distinguish between Syndiniales sequences derived from trophont or dinospore stages, and so fractionation of 18S samples (e.g., Ͻ5 m) may be useful to examine the relative abundance of Syndiniales across multiple size fractions (66). In all, these alternative techniques will be important to complement future 18S amplicon studies and verify temporal patterns and parasite-host interactions proposed via co-occurrence networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%