Protocol Based on Thromboelastograph (TEG) Out-Performs Physician Preference Using Laboratory Coagulation Tests to Guide Blood Replacement During and After Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study

Westbrook, Andrew; Olsen, Jodi; Bailey, Michael; Bates, John; Scully, Michael; Salamonsen, Robert F.

doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2008.08.016

Cited by 105 publications

(110 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

107

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, Westbrook et al showed in a prospective randomised controlled study a nonstatistically significant trend toward less blood product usage in a strict protocol utilizing TEG compared to physician's choice based on clinical experience and standard laboratory coagulation tests. The study also demonstrated a cost saving benefit (52). Use of an automated protamine titration system, such as the commercially available pointof-care Hepcon®, has been shown to be associated with higher heparin and lower protamine doses.…”

Section: Clinical Application Of Near Patient Test Results and Evidenmentioning

confidence: 79%

Coagulation Measurement and Optimisation in Cardiac Surgery

Johnson¹,

Westbrook²

2012

Perioperative Considerations in Cardiac Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Clinical Application Of Near Patient Test Results and Evidenmentioning

confidence: 79%

Coagulation Measurement and Optimisation in Cardiac Surgery

Johnson¹,

Westbrook²

2012

Perioperative Considerations in Cardiac Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Fifteen trials that randomised a total of 8737 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 112,129,[135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147] Two of the included studies were published in abstract form. 139,144 The two review authors (GJM, GFS) were in agreement on the selection of included studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 15 trials identified in our search, 13 enrolled adults undergoing CABG (n = 2), 135,136 mixed cardiac surgery (n = 10), 112,129,139,140,[142][143][144][145][146][147] or surgery on the thoracic aorta (n = 1) 138 and two enrolled children undergoing surgery for congenital disease. 137,141 The sample size ranged from 22 143 to 7402 129 participants.…”

Section: Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices for safer blood management in cardiac surgery: systematic reviews, observational studies and randomised controlled trials

Murphy

Mumford

Rogers

et al. 2017

Programme Grants Appl Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report should be referenced as follows:Murphy GJ, Mumford AD, Rogers CA, Wordsworth S, Stokes EA, Verheyden V, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices for safer blood management in cardiac surgery: systematic reviews, observational studies and randomised controlled trials. Programme Grants Appl Res 2017;5(17). Programme Grants for Applied ResearchISSN 2050-4322 (Print) ISSN 2050-4330 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: journals.library@nihr.ac.ukThe full PGfAR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Programme Grants for Applied Research journalReports are published in Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PGfAR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. Programme Grants for Applied Research programmeThe Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 2006 to produce independent research findings that will have practical application for the benefit of patients and the NHS in the relatively near future. The Programme is managed by the NIHR Central Commissioning Facility (CCF) with strategic input from the Programme Director.The programme is a national response mode funding scheme that aims to provide evidence to improve health outcomes in England through promotion of health, prevention of ill health, and optimal disease management (including safety and quality), with particular emphasis on conditions causing significant disease burden.For more information about the PGfAR programme please visit the website: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding/programme-grants-forapplied-research.htm This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by PGfAR as project number RP-PG-0407-10384. The contractual start date was in July 2008. The final report began editorial review in July 2016 and was accepted for publication in April 2017. As the funder, the PGfAR programme agreed the research questions and study designs in advance with the investigators. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PGfAR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not ...

show abstract

“…Flere studier har vist at tromboelastografibaserte algoritmer kan bidra til å redusere blodforbruket, spesielt ved hjertekirurgi (13). Implementering av transfusjonsalgoritmer basert på instrumenter som tromboelastografi anbefales blant annet av den europeiske anestesiforeningen (ESA) (14).…”

Section: Når Er Tromboelastografi Nyttig?unclassified

Tromboelastografi – nyttig når det blør?

Espinosa¹,

Ekeland²

2017

Tidsskriftet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Protocol Based on Thromboelastograph (TEG) Out-Performs Physician Preference Using Laboratory Coagulation Tests to Guide Blood Replacement During and After Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study

Cited by 105 publications

References 22 publications

Coagulation Measurement and Optimisation in Cardiac Surgery

Coagulation Measurement and Optimisation in Cardiac Surgery

Diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices for safer blood management in cardiac surgery: systematic reviews, observational studies and randomised controlled trials

Tromboelastografi – nyttig når det blør?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About