2012
DOI: 10.1002/cl2.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROTOCOL: Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) for young people in treatment for non‐opioid drug use

Abstract: BACKGROUND 3 1.1 Description of the condition 1.2 Description of the intervention 1.3 How the intervention might work 1.4 Why it is important to do this review 2 OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW 13 3 METHODS 14 3.1 Criteria for considering studies for this review 3.2 Search methods for identification of studies 3.3 Data collection and analysis 3.4 Data synthesis 4 REFERENCES 29 5 APPENDICES 38 5.1 Study elilgibility screening level one & two 5.2 Data extraction 5.3 Assessment of risk of bias in included studies: Guidel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and a member of the review team (Pia Vang Hansen was a member of the review team and assisted the review authors with the literature searches). For details of search methods, see Lindstrøm et al, 2013.…”
Section: Search Methods For Identification Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…and a member of the review team (Pia Vang Hansen was a member of the review team and assisted the review authors with the literature searches). For details of search methods, see Lindstrøm et al, 2013.…”
Section: Search Methods For Identification Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Types of studies. The study designs eligible for inclusion were controlled trials (a controlled trial typically includes at least two groups, an intervention/experimental group and a control group, and outcome measures recorded pre-and posttreatment, see Lindstrøm et al, 2013 for a definition), either randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs (QRCTs), or non-RCTs (NRCTs).…”
Section: Criteria For Including Studies In the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, there is strong attention to study details, study quality per se (e.g., Becker & Curry, ; Sprenkle, ), as well as conflicting interpretations of findings from a single study or, usually via meta‐analysis, from a set of studies (Kazdin, ). Controversies exist about program effectiveness (Drug and Alcohol Findings, ; Henggeler, Schoenwald, Borduin, & Swenson, ; Littell, , ; Littell, Popa, & Burnee, ; Ogden & Hagen, ; The Campbell Collaboration, ), approach evaluations (discussed in Lindstrøm et al., ; Gambrill & Littell, ; and van der Stouwe, Asscher, Stams, Dekovi'c, & van der Laan, ), transporting family based interventions across cultures (Burkhart, ), trademarking and brand naming of established therapies (Bean, ; Eisler, ; Imber Black, ), and the unavailability of evidence‐based therapy training for most practitioners (Barth et al., ; Hogue, Henderson, Ozechowski, & Robbins, ). And, these discussions inform suggestions about needed work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%