Protocol-Directed Sedation Versus Non–Protocol-Directed Sedation to Reduce the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in Intensive Care Patients

Gonzalez, Sabina

doi:10.4037/ccn2017421

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three systematic reviews and meta-analyses [14e16] on the effects of protocol-directed sedation have recently been published. The two systematic reviews and meta-analyses [14,15] in 2017 and 2018 acquired limited evidence from randomised controlled trial (RCT) studies (only two and four RCTs, respectively) that assessed the effects of protocol-directed sedation on patient outcomes. One systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2015 [16] including RCTs and preintervention and postintervention studies found no difference in the MV period and patient's length of stay in the ICU between nurse-led sedation protocols and usual care led by physicians.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%