2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for development, calibration and validation of the Patient-Reported Inventory of Self-Management of Chronic Conditions (PRISM-CC)

Abstract: IntroductionAssessing and measuring patients’ chronic condition self-management needs are critical to quality health care and to related research. One in three adults around the world live with multiple chronic conditions. While many patient-reported measures of self-management have been developed, none has emerged as the gold standard, and all have one or more of the following limitations: (1) they fail to measure the different domains of self-management important to patients, (2) they lack sufficient specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this, further assessment of measurement equivalence across patients with different socio-demographic and chronic disease attributes is needed. Confirmation of a priori, hypothesized associations between PRISM-CC domains and variables, as detailed in the study protocol [19], provides additional evidence of construct validity. While this is encouraging, additional evidence of validity is needed.…”
Section: Key Findings and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To address this, further assessment of measurement equivalence across patients with different socio-demographic and chronic disease attributes is needed. Confirmation of a priori, hypothesized associations between PRISM-CC domains and variables, as detailed in the study protocol [19], provides additional evidence of construct validity. While this is encouraging, additional evidence of validity is needed.…”
Section: Key Findings and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The first step in development was to operationally reframe the seven TEDSS domain definitions to reflect perceived success or difficulty in self-managing each domain (Table 1 ). Item generation (Phase 1) and assessment of relevance and understanding to people living with chronic conditions (Phase 2) are previously reported [ 19 ]. Briefly, item development and selection were conducted by an international, multidisciplinary study team, which included clinicians, researchers and people living with chronic conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations