2004
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/77.4.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for rating seed orchard seedlots in British Columbia: quantifying genetic gain anddiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the aggregate success rate of the internal and external SMP was estimated to be equal to 15.0% in this study (5.4 + 9.6 = 15.0%). This value is higher than that reported by El-Kassaby et al (1993) for one application (8.3%) and lower than the average expectations of 25% proposed by Stoehr et al (2004) and Woods (2005), but it corresponded well with the 16% reported by Stoehr et al (2006) in a lodgepole pine seed orchard study. Bridgwater et al (1993) and El-Kassaby et al (1993) determined that the SMP success rate is greatly affected by timing, number, and method of applications (see above).…”
Section: Supplemental Mass Pollinationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Finally, the aggregate success rate of the internal and external SMP was estimated to be equal to 15.0% in this study (5.4 + 9.6 = 15.0%). This value is higher than that reported by El-Kassaby et al (1993) for one application (8.3%) and lower than the average expectations of 25% proposed by Stoehr et al (2004) and Woods (2005), but it corresponded well with the 16% reported by Stoehr et al (2006) in a lodgepole pine seed orchard study. Bridgwater et al (1993) and El-Kassaby et al (1993) determined that the SMP success rate is greatly affected by timing, number, and method of applications (see above).…”
Section: Supplemental Mass Pollinationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Owing to the recognition of high importance of the genetic diversity of forest stands, the concept of effective number of parents was implemented in forestry jurisdictions, e.g., in Alberta and British Columbia where N e (paternal and maternal combined) of any seed lot to be used for reforestation of Crown land must not drop below 18 and 10, respectively (Anonymous 2009;Stoehr et al 2004). The latter value is derived from the presumption that N e of 10 secures capturing of 95 % of the genetic diversity existing in the base population (Nei 1973;Yanchuk 2001).…”
Section: Mating Structure In Isolation Tents and Genetic Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimates of ΔG and ♂Ne based on male gametic contributions obtained from the DNA analysis (i.e., pedigree reconstruction) were compared to those obtained from visual assessment of male reproductive output (Stoehr et al, 2004). Pollen contamination (gene flow) was not considered into the male effective population size calculation.…”
Section: Assessment Of Genetic Gain and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic quality of the resultant seed crops is of importance since seeds are the conduct for passing breeders' efforts to the forests. Parental male (pollen) and female (seed) gametic contribution, level of inbreeding, and the extent of pollen migration (contamination) from outside sources, all determine the genetic quality of these seed crops (Stoehr et al, 2004). The availability of highly informative DNA markers such as microsatellites (Vendramin and Hansen 2005) and the development of sophisticated pedigree reconstruction methods (Jones and Ardren, 2003) made it possible to reconstruct the genetic relationships among seeds/individuals derived from natural open-pollination and classify them into their respective FS and HS families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%