PROTOCOL: Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews

Perera, Camila; Bakrania, Shivit; Ipince, Alessandra; Nesbitt-Ahmed, Zahrah; Obasola, Oluwaseun; Richardson, D. L.

doi:10.1002/cl2.1161

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…25,26 Women in our study where twice as likely to belong to a lower SES than men, and although this was controlled in the multivariable analysis, it is important to note that disadvantaged women are more susceptible to gender-based violence, social isolation, poor social support, and insufficient education than men. [27][28][29][30] A the 479,054 participants of the UK biobank, social isolation but not loneliness was associated with higher risk of allcause mortality. 31 A national health survey 4,473 people in Chile showed poorer health-related quality of life reported in women than men.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sex differences in profile and in-hospital mortality for acute stroke in Chile: data from a nationwide hospital registry

Nuñez,

Allende,

Gonzalez

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundKnowledge of local contextual sex-differences in the profile and outcome for stroke can improve service delivery. We aimed to determine sex-differences in the profile of patients with acute stroke and their associations with in-hospital mortality (I-HM) in the national hospital database of Chile.MethodsWe present a retrospective cohort based on the analysis of the 2019 Chilean database of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs), which represents 70% of the operational expenditure of the public health system. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine independent associations of acute stroke (defined by main diagnosis ICD-10 codes) and I-HM, and reported with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsOf 1,048,575 hospital discharges, 15,535 were for patients with acute stroke (7,074 [45.5%] in women) and 2,438 (15.6%) of them died in-hospital. Disparities by sex in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified for stroke and main subtypes. Women with ischemic stroke had lower I-HM (OR 0.80, 95%CI 0.70-0.92;P=0.002) compared to men; other independent predictors included age (1.03, 1.03-1.04;P<0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (1.48, 1.20-1.81;P<0.001), atrial fibrillation (1.56, 1.34-1.83;P<0.001), admission to hospital without a stroke unit (1.21, 1.05-1.39;P=0.003), and several risk factors. Conversely for intracerebral hemorrhage, women had higher I-HM than men (1.21, 1.04-1.41; P=0.02); other independent predictors included age (1.01, 1.00-1.01;P<0.001), CKD (1.54, 1.22-1.94;P<0.001), oral anticoagulant use (2.01, 1.56-2.59;P<0.001), and several risk factors.ConclusionSex disparities in patients characteristics and in-hospital mortality exist for acute stroke in Chile. I-HM is higher for acute ischemic stroke in men and higher for ICH in women. Future research is need to better identify contributing factors.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sex differences in profile and in-hospital mortality for acute stroke in Chile: data from a nationwide hospital registry

Nuñez,

Allende,

Gonzalez

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All searches were conducted between 10 February and 1 March 2021. See the review protocol for the full search strategies of academic databases (Perera et al, 2021).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. As explained in the review protocol (Perera et al, 2021), low-quality reviews were excluded from this systematic review. Although these reviews may offer contributions to the study of the impact of social protection programmes on gender equality, their quality hinders the validity of their findings and conclusions and including them could have affected the overall validity of this systematic review of reviews.…”

Section: Risk Of Bias In Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews

Perera¹,

Bakrania²,

Ipince³

et al. 2022

Campbell Systematic Reviews

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background More than half of the global population is not effectively covered by any type of social protection benefit and women's coverage lags behind. Most girls and boys living in low‐resource settings have no effective social protection coverage. Interest in these essential programmes in low and middle‐income settings is rising and in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic the value of social protection for all has been undoubtedly confirmed. However, evidence on whether the impact of different social protection programmes (social assistance, social insurance and social care services and labour market programmes) differs by gender has not been consistently analysed. Evidence is needed on the structural and contextual factors that determine differential impacts. Questions remain as to whether programme outcomes vary according to intervention implementation and design. Objectives This systematic review aims to collect, appraise, and synthesise the evidence from available systematic reviews on the differential gender impacts of social protection programmes in low and middle‐income countries. It answers the following questions: What is known from systematic reviews on the gender‐differentiated impacts of social protection programmes in low and middle‐income countries? What is known from systematic reviews about the factors that determine these gender‐differentiated impacts? What is known from existing systematic reviews about design and implementation features of social protection programmes and their association with gender outcomes? Search Methods We searched for published and grey literature from 19 bibliographic databases and libraries. The search techniques used were subject searching, reference list checking, citation searching and expert consultations. All searches were conducted between 10 February and 1 March 2021 to retrieve systematic reviews published within the last 10 years with no language restrictions. Selection Criteria We included systematic reviews that synthesised evidence from qualitative, quantitative or mixed‐methods studies and analysed the outcomes of social protection programmes on women, men, girls, and boys with no age restrictions. The reviews included investigated one or more types of social protection programmes in low and middle‐income countries. We included systematic reviews that investigated the effects of social protection interventions on any outcomes within any of the following six core outcome areas of gender equality: economic security and empowerment, health, education, mental health and psychosocial wellbeing, safety and protection and voice and agency. Data Collection and Analysis A total of 6265 records were identified. After removing duplicates, 5250 records were screened independently and simultaneously by two reviewers based on title and abstract and 298 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Another 48 records, identified through the initial scoping exercise, consultations with experts and citation searching, were also screened. The review includes 70 hi...

show abstract

“…The article search strategy in this study employed a systematic literature review method following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 20 as displayed in Figure 1. The protocol for this review was previously published on PROSPERO (registration no.…”

Section: Protocol and Registrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Association Between Orofacial Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review

Anita,

Asnely Putri,

Maulina

2024

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The occurrence of orofacial pain is often accompanied by comorbid conditions such as depression. Even though previous studies suggested a bidirectional correlation between orofacial pain and psychological factors, some studies still provided contradictory results. Objective This systematic review aimed at providing scientific evidence regarding the association between orofacial pain and depression in published literature. Methods The current study is a systematic literature review (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023438596) that was conducted by reviewing cross-sectional studies that investigated the association between orofacial pain and depression. Article selection was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Articles searching was performed by using three databases, namely PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus using the Boolean operator method. Article screening was carried out by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as duplication checking, suitability checking, and compatibility checking. Reviewed articles went through the risk of bias evaluation form from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Extracted data were analyzed in a qualitative method. Results Twelve studies that were conducted on 5557 participants were included in the final review. After all articles were analyzed, the correlation between orofacial pain and depression was revealed. Most articles revealed a positive correlation between orofacial pain and depression, and the rest showed how orofacial pain patients showed significantly higher depression scores compared to those individuals without orofacial pain. Conclusion The results of this systematic review suggested a correlation between orofacial pain and depression with varying degrees. Incorporating potential depressive symptoms’ treatment, when treating orofacial pain patients, should be part of the treatment plan.

show abstract

PROTOCOL: Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews

Cited by 6 publications

References 56 publications

Sex differences in profile and in-hospital mortality for acute stroke in Chile: data from a nationwide hospital registry

Sex differences in profile and in-hospital mortality for acute stroke in Chile: data from a nationwide hospital registry

Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews

The Association Between Orofacial Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About