2011
DOI: 10.1002/cl2.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROTOCOL: Interventions to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in African countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the authors of the present systematic review specifically examined the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the prevalence of FGM/C in a systematic review (Denison et al, 2009). Through our literature search of February 2009 we identified a total of seven controlled studies, six of which could be obtained in full text.…”
Section: Interventions To Reduce the Prevalence Of Fgm/cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, the authors of the present systematic review specifically examined the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the prevalence of FGM/C in a systematic review (Denison et al, 2009). Through our literature search of February 2009 we identified a total of seven controlled studies, six of which could be obtained in full text.…”
Section: Interventions To Reduce the Prevalence Of Fgm/cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, for level 1 screening, two reviewers (RB and ED) independently performed an assessment of the identified records by reading the title, and when available, abstract. The pre-developed inclusion questions for level 1 were based on the inclusion criteria described above (questions available in the protocol, Denison et al, 2011). The reviewers answered each question 'Yes' (=promote), or 'Can't tell' (=promote), or 'No' (=exclude, do not promote).…”
Section: Screening and Selection Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence shows that training can be effective in imparting knowledge to health-care workers [ 56 , 57 ]; enhance their skills in managing complications related to FGM in health-care settings [ 58 ] as well as evaluating the risk of exposure to FGM [ 59 ]; and might change their attitudes towards FGM [ 56 ] or even be critical for rejecting/preventing the practice [ 56 , 60 ]. However, in contrast, other systematic reviews suggested that training health personnel did not change their knowledge and beliefs/attitudes regarding FGM and fewer providers wished to play a role in educating clients about the practice and a sense of advocacy among participating health personnel appeared weak [ 10 , 11 ]. Although there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of interventions at the service level, available evidence shows that training health-care providers can improve their knowledge and skills to act as agents of change in the prevention of FGM and offer quality services to clients seeking care post-FGM [ 56 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Another preventative aspect is effective educational interventions. Denison et al (2009) 42 showed that community empowerment through education and multifaceted social activities was more effective than training health personnel in reducing the prevalence of female genital mutilation. Education is a key indicator of protecting women from circumcision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%