2017
DOI: 10.1002/cl2.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROTOCOL: The Direct and Indirect Effects of School‐Based Executive Function Interventions on Children and Adolescents’ Executive Function, Academic, Social‐Emotional, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The current meta-analysis is interested in various types of school-based nonpharmacological EF interventions for typically developing school children and adolescents across multiple disciplines. Our review of literature shows that majority of interested EF interventions fall into two broad categories: school curricula/educational programs and mind-body interventions. These school-based interventions both target on EF but differ in key design mechanisms. Table 1 presents some representative programs for these t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review did not have an explicit focus on universal, school‐based programmes (79% of included studies were school‐based, and only a third were universal). A protocol for a review of school‐based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion (Valdebenito, Eisner, Farrington, Ttofi, & Sutherland, 2015). This review focuses on school exclusions and thus does not include a wider range of social emotional learning measures. A protocol for a review of school‐based executive functioning interventions (Steenbergen‐Hu, Olszewski‐Kubilius, & Calvert, 2017). This review focusses solely on core components of executive function, and aims to use direct executive function outcomes and so does not focus on wider social and emotional learning. A review of mindfulness‐based interventions for improving academic achievement, behaviour and socio‐emotional functioning of primary and secondary students (Maynard, Solis, Miller, & Brendel, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This review did not have an explicit focus on universal, school‐based programmes (79% of included studies were school‐based, and only a third were universal). A protocol for a review of school‐based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion (Valdebenito, Eisner, Farrington, Ttofi, & Sutherland, 2015). This review focuses on school exclusions and thus does not include a wider range of social emotional learning measures. A protocol for a review of school‐based executive functioning interventions (Steenbergen‐Hu, Olszewski‐Kubilius, & Calvert, 2017). This review focusses solely on core components of executive function, and aims to use direct executive function outcomes and so does not focus on wider social and emotional learning. A review of mindfulness‐based interventions for improving academic achievement, behaviour and socio‐emotional functioning of primary and secondary students (Maynard, Solis, Miller, & Brendel, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review focuses on school exclusions and thus does not include a wider range of social emotional learning measures. A protocol for a review of school‐based executive functioning interventions ( Steenbergen‐Hu, Olszewski‐Kubilius, & Calvert, 2017 ). This review focusses solely on core components of executive function, and aims to use direct executive function outcomes and so does not focus on wider social and emotional learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%