Protocole of a controlled before-after evaluation of a national health information technology-based program to improve healthcare coordination and access to information

Abstract

BackgroundImprovement of coordination of all health and social care actors in the patient pathways is an important issue in many countries. Health Information (HI) technology has been considered as a potentially effective answer to this issue. The French Health Ministry first funded the development of five TSN (“Territoire de Soins Numérique”/Digital health territories) projects, aiming at improving healthcare coordination and access to information for healthcare providers, patients and the population, and at improving healthcare professionals work organization. The French Health Ministry then launched a call for grant to fund one research project consisting in evaluating the TSN projects implementation and impact and in developing a model for HI technology evaluation.MethodsEvaTSN is mainly based on a controlled before-after study design. Data collection covers three periods: before TSN program implementation, during early TSN program implementation and at late TSN program implementation, in the five TSN projects’ territories and in five comparison territories. Three populations will be considered: “TSN-targeted people” (healthcare system users and people having characteristics targeted by the TSN projects), “TSN patient users” (people included in TSN experimentations or using particular services) and “TSN professional users” (healthcare professionals involved in TSN projects). Several samples will be made in each population depending on the objective, axis and stage of the study.Four types of data sources are considered: 1) extractions from the French National Heath Insurance Database (SNIIRAM) and the French Autonomy Personalized Allowance database, 2) Ad hoc surveys collecting information on knowledge of TSN projects, TSN program use, ease of use, satisfaction and understanding, TSN pathway experience and appropriateness of hospital admissions, 3) qualitative analyses using semi-directive interviews and focus groups and document analyses and 4) extractions of TSN implementation indicators from TSN program database.DiscussionEvaTSN is a challenging French national project for the production of evidenced-based information on HI technologies impact and on the context and conditions of their effectiveness and efficiency. We will be able to support health care management in order to implement HI technologies. We will also be able to produce an evaluation toolkit for HI technology evaluation.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02837406, 08/18/2016.

Sociodemographic determinants of internet use and its impact on family planning behavior among young male in Ethiopia: evidence from EDHS 2016

“…In general, this will help to reduce the gap of information between health professionals and the population. 23,31 Generally, internet use has a great contribution in transferring of health information among youth. This study was done on male respondents because male respondents used the internet more than female ones.…”

An evaluation of five regional health information technology-based programmes to improve health and social care coordination: A quasi-experimental controlled before/after mixed design

“…The study was based on a controlled before/after study mixed design, initially covering three periods: (1) before programme was implemented (2012–2015), (2) the programme’s early implementation period (2016) and (3) the later implementation period (initially planned to start in 2017). 15 The methods were similar to those used in previous evaluations. 16,17…”

Data management system for diabetes clinical trials: a pre-post evaluation study

“…It is worth noting that conducting an evaluation study before and after using a system can be an effective method to obtain user feedback and measure their expectations [30]. This type of evaluation leads to more contacts with the real users of the system and is an advantage for the precise understanding of the system performance [31]. In fact, a good technical design and willingness of users to use the new technology are critical factors for the successful implementation of clinical information systems [22].…”