1993
DOI: 10.2737/pnw-gtr-311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocols for care and handling of deer and elk at the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a dependable bite‐count technique to estimate intake rate (Renecker and Hudson , Wairimu and Hudson ), and we minimized observer bias by limiting collection of diet data to 2 personnel (RC and JC) throughout the project. We conducted this research in accordance with an approved animal welfare protocol (Starkey Experimental Forest and Range Animal Care and Use Committee Protocol #92‐F004; Wisdom et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a dependable bite‐count technique to estimate intake rate (Renecker and Hudson , Wairimu and Hudson ), and we minimized observer bias by limiting collection of diet data to 2 personnel (RC and JC) throughout the project. We conducted this research in accordance with an approved animal welfare protocol (Starkey Experimental Forest and Range Animal Care and Use Committee Protocol #92‐F004; Wisdom et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research was conducted under approval and guidance by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC 92-F-0004), as required by the United States Animal Welfare Act of 1985 and its regulations. We followed protocols established specifically by the IACUC for conducting cattle, elk, and mule deer research in our study area (Wisdom et al, 1993).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. E. George, T. E. George, and D. Lay collected fecal sample and body mass data. All animals were handled in accordance with approved U.S. Forest Service animal welfare protocols (Wisdom et al, 1993).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%