2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10152-013-0358-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protodrilus (Protodrilidae, Annelida) from the southern and southeastern Brazilian coasts

Abstract: Protodrilus corderoi, Protodrilus ovarium n. sp. and Protodrilus pythonius n. sp. are reported from beaches in southern and southeastern Brazil and described combining live observations with light and electron scanning microscopy studies. Protodrilus corderoi is redescribed from new collections at the type locality, and a neotype for the species is assigned since the original type material no longer exists. New information on reproductive organs, segmental adhesive glands and unpigmented ciliary receptors as w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() that proper descriptions and identification should take into account both sexual and non‐reproductive characters. This is in agreement with the most recent investigations on interstitial annelids from other groups, including Nerillidae (Worsaae, Martínez, & Núñez, ; Worsaae & Rouse, ), Protodrilidae (Di Domenico, Martínez, da Cunha Lana, & Worsaae, ; Martínez et al., ), Psammodrilidae (Worsaae, Kvindebjerg, & Martínez, ; Worsaae & Sterrer, ), and Saccocirridae (Di Domenico et al., ; Jouin‐Toulmond & Gambi, ), which have shown that while both sexual and non‐reproductive characters are needed for species identification, so is the implementation of various microscopy techniques to distinguish both external and internal variation. Furthermore, given the degree of homoplasy across morphological characters, it suggests that multiple specimens should be investigated and discussed in order to account for intraspecific variation due to varying degrees of maturity in male species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…() that proper descriptions and identification should take into account both sexual and non‐reproductive characters. This is in agreement with the most recent investigations on interstitial annelids from other groups, including Nerillidae (Worsaae, Martínez, & Núñez, ; Worsaae & Rouse, ), Protodrilidae (Di Domenico, Martínez, da Cunha Lana, & Worsaae, ; Martínez et al., ), Psammodrilidae (Worsaae, Kvindebjerg, & Martínez, ; Worsaae & Sterrer, ), and Saccocirridae (Di Domenico et al., ; Jouin‐Toulmond & Gambi, ), which have shown that while both sexual and non‐reproductive characters are needed for species identification, so is the implementation of various microscopy techniques to distinguish both external and internal variation. Furthermore, given the degree of homoplasy across morphological characters, it suggests that multiple specimens should be investigated and discussed in order to account for intraspecific variation due to varying degrees of maturity in male species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consequently, this report should be considered as a first attempt to assess the diversity of interstitial annelids in the Caribbean coasts of Colombia, demanding further research with additional morphological techniques, such as electron and confocal laser scanning microscopy, combined with methods of DNA taxonomy. These methods have helped solving several species complexes, their geographic distribution, and phylogenetic relationships (Di Domenico, Martínez, Lana, & Worsaae, 2013;Martínez et al, 2013;Worsaae et al, 2015). In order to warrant the re-identification of the reported species, each of our records is supported by a short description of the main light microscopy characters based on direct examination of our specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Node support was assessed via the thorough bootstrapping (with 1000 pseudoreplicates). The protodrilid Protodrilus pythonius Di Domenico, Martínez, Lana and Worsaae, 2013 [26] was used as an outgroup, based on recent phylogenetic results [11,15]. Haplotype networks were generated for the COI data obtained for three of the new species using the TCS algorithm [31] in PopArt [32].…”
Section: Molecular Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%