2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja027140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton Aurora on Mars: A Dayside Phenomenon Pervasive in Southern Summer

Abstract: We present observations of proton aurora at Mars made using the Imaging UltraViolet Spectrograph (IUVS) onboard the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft. Martian proton aurora display a prominent intensity enhancement in the hydrogen Lyman-alpha (121.6 nm) emission between~110 and 150 km altitude. Using altitude-intensity profiles from periapsis limb scan data spanning nearly two Martian years, we create a comprehensive database of proton aurora and characterize their phenomenology. Due to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The disk brightness in dusty periods (i.e., L S > 180°) was ∼2–5 times larger than that in periods 1 and 2 which correspond to the nondusty season (i.e., L S < 180°). This increase rate is similar to or somewhat smaller than those seen in other features in the hydrogen upper atmosphere from the nondusty season to the southern summer solstice (i.e., L S = 270°), such as hydrogen escape rates (<10 times) (Chaffin, Deighan, Schneider, & Stewart, 2017; Rahmati et al., 2018), hydrogen column density upstream the BS (∼10 times) (Halekas, 2017), the deuterium Ly‐α limb brightness (∼10 times) (Mayyasi et al., 2017), the occurrence rate of the proton aurora (∼4–5 times) (Hughes et al., 2019). This indicates that the effect of the optical thickness becomes important and the disk brightness does not simply reflect the column density in the dusty season, meaning that the relative change in the Ly‐β brightness should be a lower limit of the relative change in the column density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disk brightness in dusty periods (i.e., L S > 180°) was ∼2–5 times larger than that in periods 1 and 2 which correspond to the nondusty season (i.e., L S < 180°). This increase rate is similar to or somewhat smaller than those seen in other features in the hydrogen upper atmosphere from the nondusty season to the southern summer solstice (i.e., L S = 270°), such as hydrogen escape rates (<10 times) (Chaffin, Deighan, Schneider, & Stewart, 2017; Rahmati et al., 2018), hydrogen column density upstream the BS (∼10 times) (Halekas, 2017), the deuterium Ly‐α limb brightness (∼10 times) (Mayyasi et al., 2017), the occurrence rate of the proton aurora (∼4–5 times) (Hughes et al., 2019). This indicates that the effect of the optical thickness becomes important and the disk brightness does not simply reflect the column density in the dusty season, meaning that the relative change in the Ly‐β brightness should be a lower limit of the relative change in the column density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the residual from the linear fit was large (+58%) in this period and thus other effects might have contributed to the large disk brightness. One possible candidate is the proton aurora (Deighan et al., 2018; Hughes et al., 2019). The solar wind variation associated with the ICME could increase the proton aurora and change the disk brightness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traveling at the solar wind speed, and unhindered by electromagnetic fields, the hydrogen ENAs precipitate into the upper atmosphere. There, the hydrogen ENAs interact with the atmosphere through a variety of collisional processes that result in energy deposition, excitation, and ionization of atmospheric species (Kallio & Barabash, 2001), proton aurora (Deighan et al., 2018; Hughes et al., 2019; Ritter et al., 2018), and ENA electron attachment and stripping (Bisikalo et al., 2017; Shematovich et al., 2011). Through these collisional processes, the ENAs are scattered, and a small fraction of them undergo enough collisions to be reflected back to space, resulting in a population of backscattered ENAs (Kallio & Barabash, 2001; Wang et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to electron polar aurorae, the proton aurorae are observed only on the day side of the Mars, and these demonstrate an enhanced brightness of the hydrogen Lyα (121.6 nm) radiation revealed in limb observations within the altitude range of 120-150 km [4,6]. In the peak of radiation, the brightness increases by 50% (compared with the optically thick emission background observed throughout the day time) and continues to several hours maximum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the first approximation, we need to know only the number and spectrum of ENA-H atoms crossing the IM boundary for a correct interpretation of the observed proton aurorae. However, the flux of ENA-H atoms strongly depends on variations occurring in the density of the hydrogen corona and in the SW parameters [4,6]; thus, for the interpretation of observed proton aurorae, we must estimate the flux of ENA-H atoms considering parameters of the real medium. For the first time, the charge exchange efficiency has been calculated in [1,2], but the recent discovery of proton aurorae requires further investigations of the proton penetration into upper layers of the Martian atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%