2021
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton Beam Therapy for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

Abstract: Background/Aim: Curing local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) is difficult with conventional photon radiotherapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) on the other hand, has unique physical characteristics that permit higher doses to LRRC while minimizing side effects on surrounding organs. However, the efficacy of PBT on controlling rectal cancer recurrence has not yet been reported. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities of PBT for LRRC. Patients and Methods: Clinical outcomes were retrospectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No difference in toxicity outcomes was observed with excellent QoL scores for the entire patient cohort ( 16 ). Other results of moderate hypofractionated PBT for prostate cancer and a single study on high-dose (75 Gy RBE in 25 fractions) definitive PBT for pelvic recurrences of colorectal adenocarcinoma reported very low rates of grade 2+ toxicities not exceeding 15%, comparable to the outcomes for abdominal and pelvic tumors of our series ( 17 19 ). The significantly better toxicity profile of hPBT compared to nPBT in our study can be possibly attributed to the lower EQD2 prescription dose used for most hPBT cases: for low-risk prostate cancer, which comprised the majority of patients in the group of abdominal and pelvic tumors, the assumed tumor α/β ratio was lower than one used to recalculate constraints for critical organs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…No difference in toxicity outcomes was observed with excellent QoL scores for the entire patient cohort ( 16 ). Other results of moderate hypofractionated PBT for prostate cancer and a single study on high-dose (75 Gy RBE in 25 fractions) definitive PBT for pelvic recurrences of colorectal adenocarcinoma reported very low rates of grade 2+ toxicities not exceeding 15%, comparable to the outcomes for abdominal and pelvic tumors of our series ( 17 19 ). The significantly better toxicity profile of hPBT compared to nPBT in our study can be possibly attributed to the lower EQD2 prescription dose used for most hPBT cases: for low-risk prostate cancer, which comprised the majority of patients in the group of abdominal and pelvic tumors, the assumed tumor α/β ratio was lower than one used to recalculate constraints for critical organs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In one study, 13 patients received 70 GyE in 25 fractions, resulting in a local control rate of 46% and only one G3/4 toxicity [ 87 ]. Another study retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 12 patients who received PBT to LRRC [ 88 ]. With a median follow-up of 42.9 months, the 3-year PFS and OS rates were 12.1% and 71.3%, respectively, with no G 2+ acute or late toxicities noted.…”
Section: Anorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the main treatment strategies for rectal cancer [ 2 ]. Recently, charged particle beam therapies, including those with proton beams [ 3–5 ] and carbon-ion beams [ 6–10 ], have been applied in rectal cancer treatment. The rates of local recurrence are approximately 5% and 11% for radiotherapy + surgery and surgery only, respectively [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our carbon-ion beam facility has treated more than 13 000 patients since 1994 [ 12–15 ]. For locally recurrent rectal cancer treated with carbon-ion beam therapy, the overall survival rates have been 73% at 3 years and 51% at 5 years [ 16 ], compared with photon- and proton-beam treatments which had a 3-year overall survival of 64% and 71.3% and 5-year overall survival of 24.9% and 60% (as estimated from figures in [ 3 ]), respectively [ 3 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%