2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(02)01044-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton-binding study of standard and reference fulvic acids, humic acids, and natural organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
415
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 604 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
40
415
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the SRHA, a binding site concentration of 4.9 × 10 -3 mol g -1 was taken from the literature (18). On the basis of the titration curves, >95% of the polysaccharide binding sites (COOH) were deprotonated under the studied conditions (pH ) 6.0, I ) 5 × 10 -3 M), while for SRHA this proportion was about 80% (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the SRHA, a binding site concentration of 4.9 × 10 -3 mol g -1 was taken from the literature (18). On the basis of the titration curves, >95% of the polysaccharide binding sites (COOH) were deprotonated under the studied conditions (pH ) 6.0, I ) 5 × 10 -3 M), while for SRHA this proportion was about 80% (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…HS are composed of amorphous, chemically complex and internally structured molecules or molecular aggregates (Avena and Wilkinson, 2002;Sutton and Sposito, 2005) with a polyelectrolyte nature that can be classified as softcolloidal matter (Duval et al, 2005). The charge density of HS depends on the pH and at the pH conditions in most natural waters HS are negatively charged (Milne et al, 1995;Ritchie and Perdue, 2003). The charge density of humic particles is a dominant factor for the interactions of HS with: (1) heavy metal ions (Milne et al, 2003;Koopal et al, 2005;Merdy et al, 2006), (2) oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (Bolto et al, 1999;Kam and Gregory, 2001;Hankins et al, 2006), (3) proteins (Tan et al, 2008(Tan et al, , 2009), (4) cationic surfactants Yee et al, 2006;Ishiguro et al, 2007) and (5) mineral surfaces Filius et al, 2000;Saito et al, 2004;Weng et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the value of the pK 1 of LSLHA, determined [7] to be 3.89, lowering the pH to 2.5 for solubility reversal corresponds to the carboxyl groups of the material being approximately 96% protonated.…”
Section: Ph Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pKa of LSLHA was determined by titrating 125 mL of 40 mg/L LSLHA with a carbonate-free 0.04 M NaOH solution, held at 22 ∘ C under nitrogen [7]. After dissolution of the HA sample with a minimal amount of base, the solution was acidified to pH 2.5 with HCl prior to titration.…”
Section: Pkamentioning
confidence: 99%